Search results

From GDPRhub
  • 4, 5 and 6 are, in each case, effective, proportionate and dissuasive. 2. Depending on the specific characteristics of each case, administrative fines are
    93 KB (14,936 words) - 17:09, 6 December 2023
  • there is no case number (e.g. because the case was not published or a court or DPA does not use case numbers) you can us a case name. If the case was not published
    17 KB (2,638 words) - 11:18, 19 February 2024
  • List of results by case List of documents Search result: 1 case(s) 1 documents analysed Deutsche WohnenCase C-807/21 Reports of Cases Information not available
    7 KB (936 words) - 16:39, 12 December 2023
  • personal data because they allowed users to be identified even though this case was concerning collection and identification of IP addresses by internet
    9 KB (1,113 words) - 13:10, 1 June 2023
  • information agency already to be regarded as pursuing a legitimate interest in the case where it imports data from the public register without a specific reason
    15 KB (2,180 words) - 08:23, 13 December 2023
  • Directive, what factors are relevant in determining whether in any given case such script is personal data, and what weight should be given to such factors
    6 KB (766 words) - 21:17, 5 March 2024
  • Article 34 shall be provided free of charge. In the case of manifestly unfounded or, in particular in the case of frequent repetition, excessive requests by
    51 KB (8,592 words) - 07:03, 2 November 2021
  • 0105 Oslo, Norway). The DPA will reconsider the case. If it upholds its decision it forwards the case, all relevant documents and a transmission letter
    5 KB (427 words) - 15:48, 24 January 2022
  • 16 July 2020 in case C-311/18, Schrems II, paragraphs 101 and 105. [2] Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 16 July 2020 in case C-311/18, Schrems
    75 KB (11,733 words) - 16:33, 21 August 2022
  • Chromebook case Date: 18-08-2022 Decision Public authorities Prohibition Reported breach of personal data security In a much publicized case about the use
    117 KB (18,075 words) - 10:19, 12 September 2022
  • each individual case. Each supervisory authority must ensure that the imposition of administrative penalty charges in each individual case are effective
    113 KB (12,773 words) - 15:20, 6 December 2023
  • The first major case that the Supreme Court of Norway decided on regarding the right to privacy was To mistenkelige personer (Two Suspicious Individuals)
    8 KB (1,064 words) - 12:53, 23 June 2023
  • be. It appears from the case documents that X AS and the Trade Union disagree somewhat on the facts of the case. Although the case before the tribunal concerns
    31 KB (5,018 words) - 18:44, 5 March 2022
  • exclusively stood up on behalf of the State in the present case and in the cases with case numbers C/10/576071 / HA RK 19-693, C/10/576074 / HA RK 19-694
    14 KB (2,154 words) - 16:27, 10 March 2022
  • factually differentiated this case from Facebook Ireland C-311/18. In comparison to this case, Facebook Ireland is a case where the export of personal data
    9 KB (1,191 words) - 08:44, 23 January 2024
  • particular case, given the interests represented and the scope of the case, a decision as soon as possible is desirable. In the present case, the Chamber
    19 KB (2,707 words) - 16:50, 12 December 2023
  • of natural persons and indicate what measures may be sufficient in such cases to address such risk. Recital 78: Appropriate Technical and Organisational
    31 KB (3,535 words) - 13:52, 4 July 2024
  • receipt of the recurso. In practice, it will take 6 to 7 months and in most cases will not lead to a change of the decision. Appeal with the Superiour Administrative
    4 KB (386 words) - 15:29, 3 September 2021
  • resumed processing of the case. It appears from the case documents that the Data Inspectorate, in the period they have worked on the case, has been contacted
    144 KB (23,058 words) - 18:48, 5 March 2022
  • GDPR A4, GDPR A5 (1) Judge Thyness: Questions and background of the case (2) The case concerns the validity of the Privacy Board's decision of 21 January
    46 KB (7,024 words) - 06:18, 6 March 2022
View ( | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)