Search results

DECISIONS D A T U M 2 2 . 1 2 . 2 0 2 1 BUSINESS NUMBER W 2 7 4 2 2 4 6 1 6 6 - 1/4 E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court recognizes

Procedure. The Kp. Pursuant to Article 12 (2) (a) of the Administrative P r o c e d u r e Act, an administrative action against a decision of the Authority is

with article 1034quinquies of the Ger.W. , or via the e-Deposit IT system of Justice (Article 32ter of the Ger.W.). (get). Hielke HIJMANS Chairman of the

at Decision date July 10, 2023 business number W256 2234976-1/19E W256 2234976-2/19E I M N A M E N D E R R E P U B L I K! The Federal Administrative Court

original for more details. Ro 2020/04/0031-9 February 1, 2024 I M N A M E N D E R R E P U B L I K! The Administrative Court has through the presiding Senate President

without, however, sharing the PIN and PUK codes ”(see cit. note, p. 24, 25); r. “Company telephone and SIM therefore remained available to the Complainant

has a right to refuse to give evidence or testify (see BayVGH, loc.cit. m.w.N.). The order pursuant to § 31a para. 1 sentence 1 StVZO does not presuppose

during the control activity: see previous point 1.1., spec. letter m., r., t ., w.), preordained to assign a score to the rider for the declared purpose

Duschel, Mag. Klaus Hanten, lawyers in Vienna, against the defendant City of W*****, represented by Dr. Andreas Joklik, lawyer in Vienna. Andreas Joklik,

Administrative Court Decision date June 21, 2021 Business number W274 2237071-1 Saying W274 2237071-1 / 10E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative

Federal Administrative Court Decision date 08/26/2021 Business number W274 2242363-1 Saying W274 2242363-1 / 4E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative

of the original. Please refer to the Bulgarian original for more details. R E W E N I E No. 8 Sofia, 15 November 20 1 9 (Promulgated SG No. 99 of November

the evidence procedure carried out: 1.1. On April 24, 2023, Mr. Sebastian W*** (Managing Director of B*** - hereinafter “GF”) submitted a security breach

Administrative Court Decision date December 06, 2021 Business number W274 2243175-1 Saying W274 2243175-1 / 3E The Federal Administrative Court, through the

the cases of the ECtHR Węgrzynowski and Smolczevski v. Poland and M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, and the case of SEU Camera di commercio, Industria, Artigianato

(BVwG 30.10.2019, W258 2218465-1; 30.10.2019, W258 2216873-1; BVwG 29.04. 2020, W274 2224945-1; 21.10.2020, W274 2232028-1; 26.02.2021, W258 2224155-1; 24

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the expert lay judges Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA, rules on the appeal of Mag. XXXX , p. A. XXXX , represented

Vienna Higher Regional Court as a court of appeal of April 26, 2021, GZ 11 R 51/21g-31, with which the judgment of the Vienna Regional Court for Civil Law

demonstration to a press representative: VG Würzburg, decision of February 13, 2015 – W 7 E 15.81, juris). According to Section 123 (1) VwGO, the court can issue an

[Name of company], at [place], plaintiff, authorized representative: mr. H.W.J. melting head, and the State Secretary for Economic Affairs and Climate (Telecom