Search results

complaint under Article 77 GDPR was very clear and limited in scope. However, the DSB went on to assert a violation of Article 12 GDPR and Article 15(1)(h) GDPR

"controller" in Article 82 of the Data Protection Act, which is justified by the reference made by Article 2 of the ePrivacy Directive to Directive 95/46/EC on the

(see Article 9 DSRL 95/46/EC, Article 85 DSGVO - so-called media privilege; see above, marginal no. 11 f.). The reference in Article 9 of the DSRL 95/46/EC

paragraph 38 ff, in particular paragraph 46 f on Article 12 lit a of Directive 95/46). In this regard, the ECJ (in RZ 46) states: "If the person's right of access

processing of personal data and the free flow of such data and the repeal of Directive 95/46/EC of April 27, 2016 ( EU Regulation 2016/679 of the European Parliament

2002/58 ". The provisions of Directive No. 2002/58 were intended to specify and complement Directive No. 95/46 / EC of the European Parliament and of the

European Court of Justice of 22 June 2005 on the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC ("DPA Directive").2017, C-434/16, NOWAK Rz 33, whose statements can also be

taken pursuant to paragraph 3 of this article and of decisions taken on the basis of Article 25(6) of the Directive 95/46/EC. 5. When the information available

10 000 as a result of the infringement of an article 5.1.c) and Article 6.1 AVG (on the basis of Article 101 of the GBA Act); the publication of the decision

the e-Privacy Directive refers to Directive 95/46/EC, and in accordance with art. 94,paragraph 2 AVG should all references to Directive 95/46 / EC should

referred Question 1 Is Article 1(15)(c) of Directive (EU) 2018/843, amending the first subparagraph of Article 30(5) of Directive (EU) 2015/849 on the prevention

Litigation Chamber (Article 91, § 1 and § 2 of the LCA).- On May 28, 2019, the Litigation Chamber decides, pursuant to Article 95, § 1, 1° and Article 98 of the

"ePrivacy" directive and the GDPR, Article 1(2) of this directive provides that "the provisions of this directive specify and supplement Directive 95/46/EC "of

to Article 7(e) of Directive 95/46/EC remains relevant to this day. Article 6(1) of the GDPR takes over the wording from Article 7 of Directive 95/46/EC

and 5 (3) of Directive 2002/58, read in conjunction with Article 2 (h) of Directive 95/46 and Regulation 2016/679 4 Article 6 (11) and Article 6 (1) (a) do

application of the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC and was further specified there (see Articles 2, 4, 6, 7, 12 and 14 DSRL 95/46/EC; see ECJ, judgment of 13

data subject is a child. " (49) Article 6 continues the corresponding provision in the previously applicable Directive 95/46 / EC of 24 October 1995. Practices

the data controller data within the meaning of Article 7 of Directive 95/46 / EC, WP 217. 10 ECHR, March 25, 1983, Silver and others v. United Kingdom, para

controller’s new privacy policy violated Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive (Directive 2002/58/EC). The Article only allows the controller to process

communication, the data subject cannot rely on either Article 12 (a),of Directive 95/46 or of Article 8 (2) of the Charter the right to obtain a copy of theoriginal