Search results

found the violation of the provisions of art. 32 para. (1) and (2) and art. 33 para. (1) of the General Data Protection Regulation. The operator DADA CREATION

security breach in its voicemail box function. Had Telenor Norge violated Article 33 GDPR by failing to notify the Datatilsynet of the data breach? Had Telenor

DPA fined a magazine company €31,200 for violating Articles 5(1)(f), 32, and 33 GDPR because of a personal data security breach caused by vulnerabilities

breach to the supervisory authority, in accordance with Article 33 GDPR. Under Article 33, the controller should have reported the breach within 72 hours

been notified with regards to the security incident, in breach of Article 33 GDPR, for which the controller was fined RON 4,918.3 (approximately €1,000)

limit mandated by Article 33(1). Did the secretariat of the DPA breach its data security obligations under Articles 32(1), 33(1), and 34(1)? The Datatilsynet

rambling, abstract explanations in the reasoning for the appeal (pages 12 to 33) were noted and examined, but were not considered to be definitive. They justify

(controller) notified the Romanian DPA of two data breaches in line with Article 33 GDPR. Following the notifications, the DPA launched an investigation which

The Datatilsynet issued a decision on Articles 32 and 33 GDPR due to unencrypted e-mails sent by the controller. After carrying out investigations at its

didn't consider the incident to have triggered this requirement as per Article 33 GDPR. * Innovation Norway is state-owned and the Norwegian government's instrument

The AEPD approved a transport hub's compliance with Articles 32 and 33 GDPR after having used its investigation powers. After a security guard of Madrid’s

Authority: AEPD (Spain) Jurisdiction: Spain Relevant Law: Article 32 GDPR Article 33 GDPR Article 34 GDPR Type: Investigation Outcome: No further action Started:

violation of Articles 32, 33 and 34, violations all of which are typified in article 83.4.a). V The violation of articles 32, 33 and 34 of the RGPD are criminalized

Belgian DPA assessed whether the controller had violated Articles 5, 24, 28, 33 and 34 GDPR, however they found that none of these provisions were breached

the under General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679. According to Article 33 of GDPR, in the case of a personal data breach, the Data Controller shall

loss itself, that the information and measures mentioned in Article 33(1)(b) to Article 33(1)(d) GDPR must also be communicated to the data subject. However

referred to in Article 33(1) of the AVG.15 15 File note 1, Notification of personal data breach 7-2-2019. P 5. 3.4.3 Assessment Article 33(1) of the AVG provides

data breach was an isolated incident and the controller complied with Article 33 GDPR. An investigation was started on 20 December 2019 over the practices

à l’obligation de notifier la violation de données à la CNIL 33. Aux termes de l’article 33, paragraphe 1, du RGPD, en cas de violation de données à caractère

and the minimization of data, as well as the national legislation (d.lgs. 33/2013), which obliges the community to publish the compound emoluments received