Search results
From GDPRhub
- In what is one of the first judicial decisions on the matter, a national court held that data transfer to the US in the context of Google Analytics was66 KB (9,990 words) - 12:30, 29 January 2024
- contained in court files where the courts are not 'public authorities' with environmental responsibilities. In February 2016, the High Court of Ireland delivered5 KB (450 words) - 14:12, 18 April 2024
- The High Court - 2021 IEHC 287 (category High Court (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)management of the school brought an application in the Irish Court seeking an order that Facebook Ireland, who owns Instagram, to disclose all data it holds6 KB (683 words) - 13:01, 17 August 2021
- API version 2. The court is of the opinion that Facebook Ireland has also violated its information obligation on this point. The court explains this as follows243 KB (40,160 words) - 11:54, 5 April 2023
- contended that the Court should declare Meta’s head of claim inadmissible and dismiss the action. The Court examined whether the contested decision complies with5 KB (619 words) - 12:37, 15 June 2023
- DPC - Tusla Child and Family Agency (category DPC (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)The Irish Data Protection Commissioner (DPC) fined Tusla (the Irish Child and Family Agency) €75000 for “unintentionally providing” the personal data of6 KB (761 words) - 21:06, 24 February 2021
- to pages that contain the words selected by the user. The European Union Court of Justice ruling of 13 May 2014, in paragraph 28, states that "when exploring17 KB (2,620 words) - 14:51, 13 December 2023
- Regional Court, Vienna, Austria) on 7 December 2020. The data subject therefore lodged an appeal with the Oberster Gerichtshof (Supreme Court). The latter12 KB (1,634 words) - 14:50, 30 April 2024
- considered that Google does have EU headquarters in Ireland, but that this Irish entity ‘did not have a decision making power’ in relation to the relevant cross-border20 KB (2,932 words) - 09:51, 10 September 2021
- High Court - 2024 IEHC 337 (category High Court (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)and that of the European Court of Human Rights (“the Strasbourg Court”). He submits that the jurisprudence of the Strasbourg Court is persuasive but that65 KB (9,542 words) - 12:44, 4 July 2024
- Circuit Court - 2019/04546 (category Circuit Court (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Notwithstanding the CJEU's decision on Case C-300/21, an Irish Court held that compensation for non-material damage does not cover “mere upset”. However60 KB (9,004 words) - 09:39, 15 February 2024
- the Tribunal (formerly the Court of first instance) and the Court of Justice of the European Union (formerly the European Court of Justice)/ Referenced jurisprudence246 KB (39,598 words) - 09:26, 24 April 2024
- DPC (Ireland) - IN-20-8-1 (category DPC (Ireland)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Thus, the Irish DPA took the view that Meta Ireland acted in good faith when transferring data in lack of a proper legal basis. The Irish DPA also did7 KB (952 words) - 10:22, 24 May 2023
- Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - 1198/161/2022 (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)issued to the company. The decisions are not yet legally binding and can be appealed to the administrative court. Decisions of the Data Protection Commissioner13 KB (1,847 words) - 15:52, 11 December 2023
- See Holding for questions referred. Facts pending decision. Questions referred for a preliminary ruling: 1. Are the provisions of Article 6(1)(a) and (b)3 KB (353 words) - 11:49, 11 October 2021
- also reimburse the court fee paid by the claimant.DecisionThe court -declares the appeal well-founded;-annuls the contested decision;-determines that the22 KB (3,313 words) - 16:18, 26 January 2022
- rights, the court must put an end to this as soon as possible. Therefore, the court held that the data subject cannot be asked to wait for a decision through44 KB (6,903 words) - 14:32, 26 June 2024
- Implementing Decision (EU) Shield invalid. The Notifier argued that, on the basis of the reasoning set out in paragraph 95 of the judgment of the Court of Justice26 KB (3,861 words) - 13:55, 11 June 2024
- with the CNIL’s decision and brought the issue before court. First, it claimed that, since there is cross-border processing, the Irish DPA (DPC) is the36 KB (5,595 words) - 16:12, 2 February 2022
- (Markten Court section), X t. GBA, Judgment 2021/AR/320 of 7 July 2021, p. 24; Court of Appeal Brussels (Markten Court section), X t.GBA, Judgment 2020/AR/329350 KB (51,369 words) - 09:25, 31 January 2024