Search results

63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, 2011, on Common Administrative Procedure for Public Administrations (hereinafter referred to as LPACAP), for the

the provisions of articles 63 and 64 of the C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 – Madrid sedeaepd.gob.es 4/20 LPACAP, for the alleged violation of Article

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

in accordance with the provisions of the LOPDPGDD, and in addition to the LPACAP, in processing of sanctioning procedures. SECOND: As proven facts of the

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

provisions of article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations, which in its Section f) establishes that

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

recognizes each supervisory authority, and as established in Articles 47, 64.2 and 68.1 of the Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December, on the Protection of

indicated in the Article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common of Public Administrations, which in its section f) establishes that

in the article64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure ofPublic Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP).In accordance

no allegation has been received from the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

Articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure for Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

indicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative of Public Administrations, which in its section f) establishes that

provisions of article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations, which in its section f) establishes that

63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, 2011, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter referred to as LPACAP), for

Articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

proceedings against the respondent, with in accordance with Articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015 of 1 October on the Common Administrative Procedure for Public

with articles 64.2.f) and 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative Law of Public Administrations (LPACAP), by not carrying