Search results

decision are therefore established. 3. Legal assessment: 3.1. According to Art. 130 Para. 1 Z 1 B-VG, the administrative courts rule on complaints against

restriction, deletion or destruction. According to Art. 6 Para. 1 UA 1 S. 1 f) in conjunction with Art. 9 DS-GVO, data processing is lawful if the processing

3.3.1 Legal situation The authority concerned based its decision on the following legal bases: Art. 4(1), (2) and (7), Art. 12(3), Art. 17 and Art. 77

01/20/2022 standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §1 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 GDPR Art17 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art58 GDPR Art6 VwGVG §28 paragraph

(Article 15 Paragraph 1 Clause 1 GDPR) to the "How" (Article 15 Paragraph 1 Clause 2 lit. a-h, Paragraph 2 GDPR) to the "What" ( Art 15 para. 1 clause 2, para

(BVwG 30.10.2019, W258 2218465-1; 30.10.2019, W258 2216873-1; BVwG 29.04. 2020, W274 2224945-1; 21.10.2020, W274 2232028-1; 26.02.2021, W258 2224155-1; 24.03

October 12, 2023 standard AVG §38 B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 GDPR Art 12 GDPR Art 16 AVG § 38 today AVG § 38 valid from March 1st, 2013 last changed by Federal

Paragraph 36b(2), second sentence, No, Paragraph 365p(1)(1)(a) of the GewO1 1994, Paragraph 6(2)(1) of the Financial Market Money Laundering Law, Paragraph

The court held that under § 73(1) German Asylum Act (AsylG), Article 11(1)(e) and (f) Directive 2011/95/EU and Article 1 C Geneva Convention Relating to

standard B-VG Art 133 Paragraph 4 GDPR Art 15 GDPR Art 22 GDPR Art4 GewO 1994 §151 B-VG Art. 133 today B-VG Art. 133 valid from January 1st, 2019 to May

to the procedure. 3. Legal Assessment 3.1. To dismiss the complaint 3.1.1.1. According to Art. 130 Para. 1 Z 1 B-VG, the administrative courts recognize

"legitimate interest" according to Art 6 Para 1 lit f GDPR. The data processing can but in any case not based on Art. 6 Para. 1 lit f GDPR, because relevant

free Google Maps web application. 2. Assessment of evidence: 2.1. The findings on 1.1. – 1.5. arise from the administrative act submitted and the court file

Sections 1 (1) and (2), 9 (1) and 24 (1) and (5) of the Data Protection Act – DSG, Federal Law Gazette I No. 165/1999 as amended; Articles 4, 5, 6, 57(1)(f)

of Section 1 or Article 2 1st main item. As can be seen from Section 1 of the DPA (in accordance with Art. 1 (EU) 2016/679), OJ L 2016/119, 1 (hereinafter:

formulations in Art. 15 para. 4 (s Art. 15 margin no. 49), Art. 20 para. 4 (see Art. 20 margin no. 28), Art. 21 para. 1 (see Art. 21 margin no. 42) and Art. 23 para

submitted by the co-involved party. 3. legal assessment: 3.1 According to Art. 130 (1) line 1 B-VG, the administrative courts recognise complaints against

without consulting her. II. the Federal Administrative Court considered: 1. findings: 1.1 The complainant operates a property management company which has been

separately, e.g. according to Section 7 Para. 1 Z 2 DSG or according to Article 5 Para. 1 lit. b in connection with Art 6 Para. 4 GDPR would have to be assessed

Section 1 of the GDPR in conformity with EU law is required (Lachmayer in Knyrim, DatKomm Art 1 DSGVO Rz 70 (as of 1.12.2018, rdb.at)), which is why Art. 6