Search results

easy to understand: see eg Thaler R and Sunstein C, Nudge: The Final Edition (2021), pp 36-38; Samuelson W and Zeckhauser R, “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making”

Administrative Court Decision date June 21, 2021 Business number W274 2237071-1 Saying W274 2237071-1 / 10E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative

the evidence procedure carried out: 1.1. On April 24, 2023, Mr. Sebastian W*** (Managing Director of B*** - hereinafter “GF”) submitted a security breach

of its partners (Business Promoter s.r.l.) by an agent of a sub-agency contracted by the latter (Top Solutions s.r.l.), confirming that the called number

Federal Administrative Court Decision date 08/26/2021 Business number W274 2242363-1 Saying W274 2242363-1 / 4E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative

the cases of the ECtHR Węgrzynowski and Smolczevski v. Poland and M. L. and W. W. v. Germany, and the case of SEU Camera di commercio, Industria, Artigianato

Administrative Court Decision date December 06, 2021 Business number W274 2243175-1 Saying W274 2243175-1 / 3E The Federal Administrative Court, through the

the browser. 1 S.3. about the use of cookies in the context of pseudonymous r ng, users are informed in this Data protectionMkUrung Informed 5.4 If you do

agreement concluded on May 5, 2014. Although the PESEL number of the defendant J. R. was used when concluding the agreement, but the indicated place of residence

(BVwG 30.10.2019, W258 2218465-1; 30.10.2019, W258 2216873-1; BVwG 29.04. 2020, W274 2224945-1; 21.10.2020, W274 2232028-1; 26.02.2021, W258 2224155-1; 24

Vienna Higher Regional Court as a court of appeal of April 26, 2021, GZ 11 R 51/21g-31, with which the judgment of the Vienna Regional Court for Civil Law

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the expert lay judges Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA, rules on the appeal of Mag. XXXX , p. A. XXXX , represented

demonstration to a press representative: VG Würzburg, decision of February 13, 2015 – W 7 E 15.81, juris). According to Section 123 (1) VwGO, the court can issue an

2022 and December 14 December 2022 (access the URL: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walter_A***&oldid=*5*7**2). 4. The entry about the complainant

of a superior (cf. OVG NW, B.v. May 11, 2023 - 1 A 2432/20 - juris Rn. 11 m.w.N.). The documents in dispute mainly consist of events from the years 2004

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the experts Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA as Associate Judges, rules on the appeal of XXXX ,

for checking compliance with the provisions of the Stock Exchange Act , MiFI R and MAR standardized obligations can be made possible (as above, paragraph

of the accrued extrajudicial Business fee according to §§ 13, 14 No. 2300 W RVG in the amount of 711.03 euros plus 5 percentage points above exempt base

Paragraph 2 In connection with the construction of a nursing home in C-town in W-street X, the plaintiff commissioned the expert office of the second defendant

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the expert lay judges Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA as Associate Judges, rules on the complaint of XXXX