Search results

Article 15 GDPR. The Finnish DPA then examined in which format the Company had to provide a copy of the personal data, in light of Article 15(3) GDPR. In this

6.1.f) GDPR) and in this balancing the considerations of the GDPR related to Art. 6.1.f) GDPR eligible [...] be taken, in particular Recital 47. Thus

principle enclosed in Article 5(1)(b) GDPR. On this matter, the AEPD argued that, according to Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Recital 39 and Article 6(1)(f), an interest

transparency), Article 12(1), Article 7, Article 13 and Article 14 GDPR, the corresponding GDPR recitals (32, 39, 42, 47, 58, 60, 61, and 72), as well are Articles

third party company. The DPA held that the hospital is a controller under the GDPR. The technical and organisational measures adopted by the controller through

member states is superimposed (see Recital 146 S 4 and 5 on the GDPR; cf. also Frenzel in Paal / Pauly, GDPR-BDSG3 Art 82 GDPR margin no.1; Wybitul / Haß / Albrecht

4(1) GDPR. Moreover, OLG Celle also held that a singular access request can never be excessive for the purposes of Article 12(5) GDPR as the GDPR only

considers that, in accordance with the provisions of recital 63 of the GDPR and Article 15(4) of the GDPR, it is not obliged to respond to them if it would

LinkedIn and Salesforce.com. The DPA held that the GDPR was not applicable according to Article 3 GDPR. The controller was a company based in the United

compliance and accountability according to Article 5(1) GDPR, Article 5(2) GDPR and Article 6(1) GDPR. Since the company had totally ignored the its compliance

whether Art. 15 GDPR applies to the investigation files at all, since according to Art. 2 Para. 2 d GDPR, Section 2a Para. 4 AO, the GDPR does not apply

performance of a contract (Article 6(1)(b) GDPR) and for legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR). Article 6(1)(b) GDPR In its original draft decision, the

violation of Article 12 GDPR ? Are the following practices an infringement on data subjects' information right as described in Article 12 GDPR ? Spreading the

Article 34(1) of the GDPR-2. The appeal procedure is provided for in the GDPR for personal data falling under Article 1(1) of the GDPR. This provides that

under Article 15(1) GDPR are not covered as such by Article 82(1) GDPR. The court reached this conclusions by looking at Recital 146 GDPR and at the original

Article 17(3) GDPR. Two doctors sued a platform for deletion of their basic profile set up on the platform without their consent under Article 17 GDPR. They argued

decision of June 28, 2022 - II B 92/21, juris para. 18). 77According to recital 146 sentence 4 of the GDPR, Art. 82 GDPR applies without prejudice to claims

personal data of French data subject and held that the GDPR was applicable pursuant of Article 3(2)(a) GDPR. The DPA determined that the controller offered services

activities of SPARTOO SAS did not comply with a series of GDPR provisions (art. 5§1(c), 5§1(e), 13, 32 GDPR). In that respect, CNIL imposed a fine of 250,000 euros

the reference to Article 79(2) GDPR from Article 82(6) GDPR, and the fact that one could argue that Article 82(6) GDPR overrides Member State procedural