Search results

Article 6(1) GDPR. The Bulgarian DPA examined a complaint lodged by a citizen, V.V., against a company providing utility services (‘the company’) and a private

that it would address the more general issue of the application of Chapter V of the GDPR to video-conferencing services of companies belonging to a group

external recruitment as an "attempt 10WP 243 v.01, version revised and adopted on April 5, 2017, p. 14 11WP 243 v.01, version revised and adopted on April

appellant, Attorney at law: Mr. J.M. Molkenboer in Tilburg, by ING BANK N.V. , based in Amsterdam, Intimate, Attorney at law: Mr. I.M.C.A. Reinders Folmer

W.S. Soyo t e g e n c e s s the limited liability company ABN Amro Bank N.V. established in Amsterdam accused to be specified: ABN Amro authorised Mr E

relief proceedings should order ING c.s. and Arrow Global Benelux Holdings B.V. (hereinafter referred to as: Arrow) to remove the codes from the CKI within

Appellant, Attorney at law: Mr. K. Both at Vleuten, at the rate of ABN AMRO BANK N.V., established in Amsterdam, Intimate, Attorney at law: M.J.M.T. Keulaerds,

IT WAS ALREADY ATTENDED TO THE REQUEST RECEIVED BY THIS DEPARTMENT WITH C.S.V. XXXXXXXXXX…” SIXTH: On February 20, 2023, a proposed resolution was formulated

activities with [name bv] B.V., his activities take place. in the Netherlands also in [place of residence]. In [name bv] B.V., also established in Rotterdam

housing corporations operating in Groningen and Haren and Essent Netwerk B.V. The aim of the covenant is to combat the domestic cultivation of hemp in the

Kārtības policijas pārvalde v Rīgas pašvaldības SIA “Rīgas satiksme”, recital 28. See also CJEU, 11 December 2019, C-708/18, TK v/Asociaţia de Proprietari

Treaty establishing the European Community, such as those covered by Titles V and VI of the Treaty on European Union, and in no case is it applicable to

failed to prove an urgent interest. The complainant asked his bank (ING Bank N.V.) to remove his data from the BKR registration (office for credit) under Article

Stuttgart 1893 e.V.", a registered association under German law, into a stock corporation ("VfB Stuttgart 1893 AG"), VfB Stuttgart 1893 e.V. transferred several

person responsible for the processing who has committed the infringement.>>. V In the present case, it is clear from the investigations carried out by that

ECLI:NL:PHR:2023:935 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 [plaintiff] B.V. (hereinafter: '[plaintiff]') in return for PME Investment Services B.V. (hereinafter: 'PME') PME installed a housing

the Court of Justice of the European Union judgment is “Google Spain and Inc v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González 'C-131/12

criminal proceedings concerned, including of V.S., has been gathered. It is explained in the application that V.S. has been formally accused of an offence

of 10 September 2009 - C-97/08 - EuZW 2009, 816, 821 [Akzo Nobel and others v. Commission], para. 54 et seq.; ECJ, Judgment of 14 December 2006 - T-259/02

advertising. However, in a recent judgment C-252/21 Facebook Inc. and Others v Bundeskartellamt by the Court of Justice (hereinafter “Bundeskartellamt Judgment”)