Search results

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the experts Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA as Associate Judges, rules on the appeal of XXXX ,

M. Georgieva and T. Mitova, acting as Agents, – the French Government, by R. Bénard, A.-L. Desjonquères, D. Dubois and T. Stéhelin, acting as Agents, –

of a superior (cf. OVG NW, B.v. May 11, 2023 - 1 A 2432/20 - juris Rn. 11 m.w.N.). The documents in dispute mainly consist of events from the years 2004

easy to understand: see eg Thaler R and Sunstein C, Nudge: The Final Edition (2021), pp 36-38; Samuelson W and Zeckhauser R, “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making”

for checking compliance with the provisions of the Stock Exchange Act , MiFI R and MAR standardized obligations can be made possible (as above, paragraph

of the accrued extrajudicial Business fee according to §§ 13, 14 No. 2300 W RVG in the amount of 711.03 euros plus 5 percentage points above exempt base

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the expert lay judges Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA as Associate Judges, rules on the complaint of XXXX

Paragraph 2 In connection with the construction of a nursing home in C-town in W-street X, the plaintiff commissioned the expert office of the second defendant

not, the main Subject to legal proceedings (see OLG Karlsruhe 16.02.2011 - 4 W 108/10 - Rn.17) - 4 - a) In view of the specific circumstances of the individual

principles of the so-called Stolpe case-law (BVerfG, order of 25 October 2005, 1 BvR 1696/98), which the plaintiff invokes in a written statement of 20 October

vicinity Train station in W... are the lawyers from the law firm G...-D... Rechtsanwälte... 35 https://www.rechtsanwalts-kanzlei-w....de/achten-agg-hoppe

the browser. 1 S.3. about the use of cookies in the context of pseudonymous r ng, users are informed in this Data protectionMkUrung Informed 5.4 If you do

of its partners (Business Promoter s.r.l.) by an agent of a sub-agency contracted by the latter (Top Solutions s.r.l.), confirming that the called number

13/2005 DSG Art. 2 § 9 valid from January 1st, 2000 to March 31st, 2005 saying W274 2243598-1/10E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative Court

agreement concluded on May 5, 2014. Although the PESEL number of the defendant J. R. was used when concluding the agreement, but the indicated place of residence

Innsbruck Higher Regional Court as court of appeal of 22 August 2019, GZ 2 R 96/19p-36, thus reversing the judgment of the Regional Court Feldkirch of 9

www.bvwg.gv.at decision date 03.02.2022 business number W214 2224204-1/28E I M N A M E N D E R E P U B L I K ! The Federal Administrative Court, through

of 28.04.2020 - 1 S 1068/20 -, and of 30.04.2020 - 1 S 1101/20 -, each m.w.N.). In view of this, the provision in Section 3 (1) sentence 3 CoronaVO on

2022 and December 14 December 2022 (access the URL: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walter_A***&oldid=*5*7**2). 4. The entry about the complainant

9 ff). for the use of a website requires prior consent (cf. Article 29 -, W, P, Opinion 04/2012 on Cookie Consent Exemption, WP 194, 00879/12/EN p. 9 ff)