Search results

agreement concluded on May 5, 2014. Although the PESEL number of the defendant J. R. was used when concluding the agreement, but the indicated place of residence

(BVwG 30.10.2019, W258 2218465-1; 30.10.2019, W258 2216873-1; BVwG 29.04. 2020, W274 2224945-1; 21.10.2020, W274 2232028-1; 26.02.2021, W258 2224155-1; 24

Vienna Higher Regional Court as a court of appeal of April 26, 2021, GZ 11 R 51/21g-31, with which the judgment of the Vienna Regional Court for Civil Law

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the expert lay judges Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA, rules on the appeal of Mag. XXXX , p. A. XXXX , represented

demonstration to a press representative: VG Würzburg, decision of February 13, 2015 – W 7 E 15.81, juris). According to Section 123 (1) VwGO, the court can issue an

2022 and December 14 December 2022 (access the URL: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walter_A***&oldid=*5*7**2). 4. The entry about the complainant

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the experts Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA as Associate Judges, rules on the appeal of XXXX ,

of a superior (cf. OVG NW, B.v. May 11, 2023 - 1 A 2432/20 - juris Rn. 11 m.w.N.). The documents in dispute mainly consist of events from the years 2004

for checking compliance with the provisions of the Stock Exchange Act , MiFI R and MAR standardized obligations can be made possible (as above, paragraph

of the accrued extrajudicial Business fee according to §§ 13, 14 No. 2300 W RVG in the amount of 711.03 euros plus 5 percentage points above exempt base

Paragraph 2 In connection with the construction of a nursing home in C-town in W-street X, the plaintiff commissioned the expert office of the second defendant

Administrative Court, by Judge LUGHOFER as Chairman and the expert lay judges Prof. KommR POLLIRER and Dr. GOGOLA as Associate Judges, rules on the complaint of XXXX

principles of the so-called Stolpe case-law (BVerfG, order of 25 October 2005, 1 BvR 1696/98), which the plaintiff invokes in a written statement of 20 October

vicinity Train station in W... are the lawyers from the law firm G...-D... Rechtsanwälte... 35 https://www.rechtsanwalts-kanzlei-w....de/achten-agg-hoppe

not, the main Subject to legal proceedings (see OLG Karlsruhe 16.02.2011 - 4 W 108/10 - Rn.17) - 4 - a) In view of the specific circumstances of the individual

13/2005 DSG Art. 2 § 9 valid from January 1st, 2000 to March 31st, 2005 saying W274 2243598-1/10E IN THE NAME OF THE REPUBLIC! The Federal Administrative Court

advice in order to be clarified. According to §§ 2 Para. 2, 13 RVG No. 2300 W RVG, the claim amounts to €1,029.35. Since the cross-appeal does not attack

with article 1034quinquies of the Ger.W. , or via the e-Deposit IT system of Justice (Article 32ter of the Ger.W.). (get). Hielke HIJMANS Chairman of the

of 28.04.2020 - 1 S 1068/20 -, and of 30.04.2020 - 1 S 1101/20 -, each m.w.N.). In view of this, the provision in Section 3 (1) sentence 3 CoronaVO on

Innsbruck Higher Regional Court as court of appeal of 22 August 2019, GZ 2 R 96/19p-36, thus reversing the judgment of the Regional Court Feldkirch of 9