Search results

review against non-final judgments or judicial acts of any nature which cannot be appealed against by any other means, and in the case of which the legal proceedings

not be used to take decisions or measures relating to the data subject, nor for other purposes. Statistical and scientific research purposes must be clearly

states that the processing cannot be based on Article 6(1)(e) GDPR. For this to be the case, the processing must be necessary for the performance of a

that the data cannot be rectified on the merits and that not all data subjects' rights can be exercised. They could therefore not be subject to the DSGVO

assesses whether the users who enter assessments on the site should be allowed to be anonymous externally. 2. Fact The company Legelisten.no AS (hereinafter

intended to be stored for one month, identification cannot be expected possible during the "lifetime" of the information and they should not be considered

themselves be considered to make individuals identifiable, it must be taken into account that in the present case those unique identifiers can be combined

themselves be considered make individuals identifiable, however, it must be considered that these unique identifiers in it the current case can be combined

disclosure that can be taken into account in this context is also to be assumed if personal data is posted on a platform that can be accessed from a third

must be appropriate and relevant in terms of the purposes of data processing , and must be limited to what is necessary ("data saving"); d) must be accurate

order for there to be a basis for treatment under Article 6 (1) (f) of the GDPR, three conditions must be met: First, there must be legitimate interests

measures shall be in line with the state of the art. However, this cannot guarantee that in exceptional situations they will always be effective. In addition

adequate must be substantiated. When determining the sanction in concrete terms, the following should be taken into account general criteria should be leading:

to the authorities in individual cases will be subject to inspection in 2021. The decision will therefore be sent to the Police Board and the Helsinki Police

its restriction may only be the exception. However, the rule-exception relationship would be reversed if contract data were to be transferred without any

GDPR) is also taken into account. If a second language was to be used, English would be appropriate, as long as cooperation between supervisory authorities

infringement fee shall be imposed for the illegal camera surveillance, and if a fee is to be imposed, how large the fee shall be. It appears from the case

to be processed in such a way. Regarding the accuracy principle, they argue that accuracy of data released by public bodies must be presumed to be accurate

Protection Act cannot be extended to a data subject applying for insurance. Therefore, Section 6(1)(1) of the Finnish Data Protection Act cannot be applied to the

personal data must be determined according to the purpose of the processing. When this purpose is achieved, the data must either be deleted or be subject to intermediate