Search results

Lithuanian Hungarian Maltese Dutch Polish Portuguese Romanian Slovak Slovenian Finnish Swedish Croatian ECLI:EU:C:2022:805 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (first panel)

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. The processing of the employee's

in due time the data breaches to the Finnish DPA and to the data subjects, respectively. Furthermore, the Finnish DPA found that Article 5(1)(f) GDPR had

The decision below is a machine translation of the Finnish original. Please refer to the Finnish original for more details. Implementing registered rights

customer account. Complaint 3 (Finland with national diary number 2648/182/2018) On 31 May 2018, the complainant contacted the Finnish data protection authority

subject then applied to the Finnish DPA for an order that the controller should provide him with the information requested. The Finnish DPA sided with the controller

Belgium · Bulgaria · Croatia · Cyprus · Czech Republic · Denmark · Estonia · Finland (Åland) · France · Germany (Baden-Württemberg · Bavaria, private sector

Court of Human Rights of 27 June 2017 in case no. 931/13 which concerned Finnish companies' publication of information on the income of one third of the

mechanism, it appears that the German, Austrian, Belgian, Danish, Spanish, Finnish, Greek, Irish, Italian, Dutch, Norwegian and Polish authorities , Portuguese

Estonia AKI (Estonia) - 2.1.-X/XX/XXXX European Union Finland Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - number of the case France CNIL (France) - SAN-year-XXX

this information. The data subject therefore lodged a complaint with the Finnish DPA. Another data subject, in Denmark, contacted the same controller, also

July 2008, I. c. Finland, req. n °20511/03, in which the Court finds unanimously that there has been a violation of Article 8 by the Finnish authorities,on

Denmark, the Netherlands, Spain, Latvia, Sweden, Luxembourg, France, Norway, Finland, Slovakia and Slovenia. Share blogs or news articles here! The decision

Decision to address the infringement of Article 6(1) GDPR. Most notably, the Finnish DPA stated that the DPC should use its corrective powers to at least order

Endemol Shine Finland brought an appeal against the judgement before the Itä-Suomen hovioikeus (Court of Appeal, Eastern Finland, Finland). The latter stayed

it appears that the German, Austrian, Belgian, Cypriot, Danish, Spanish, Finnish, Greek, Irish, Italian, Luxembourg and Dutch authorities , Norwegian, Polish

ECHR of 27 June 2017, Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy and Satamedia Oy v. Finland, CE:ECHR:2017:0627JUD000093113, section 165)”. In such a way, that for a

explains why the Swedish and Finnish data protection authorities This approach also explains why the Swedish and Finnish Data Protection Authorities have

authorities concerned have been the data protection authorities in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Estonia. 1Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament

Denmark, Norway and Finland. The complaints The complainants have mainly stated the following. Complaint 1 (Complaint from Finland with national registration