Search results

cause physical, material or immaterial damage. In this same sense, recital 83 of the GDPR states that: “(83) In order to maintain security and prevent processing

83.5.a) of the aforementioned Regulation 2016/679. In this sense, Recital 40 of the GDPR states: “(40) For the processing to be lawful, the personal data

employees. The DPA found a violation of Article 5(1)(b) GDPR, Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 13 GDPR. Following a visit to the premises of two public bodies

member states is superimposed (see Recital 146 S 4 and 5 on the GDPR; cf. also Frenzel in Paal / Pauly, GDPR-BDSG3 Art 82 GDPR margin no.1; Wybitul / Haß / Albrecht

Article 31 GDPR in conjunction with Article 58(1)(e) GDPR. The AEPD, therefore, agreed to impose a penalty of € 20000 under Article 83(5)(e) GDPR. The fact

understood. Article 15 of the GDPR belongs to Chapter III of the GDPR, entitled "The rights of the data subject". Recital 11 in the preamble states that

established in articles 12 of the GDPR and 12 of the LOPDGDD. Furthermore, what is expressed in Recitals 59 et seq. of the GDPR is taken into account. In accordance

Respondent explained that the GDPR does not recognize any express “group privilege”, but it can be deduced from Recital 48 to the GDPR that an exchange of customer

processing activities. compliance with the GDPR, including the effectiveness of the measures (GDPR recital 74). In summary, this principle requires a conscious

infringement of article 5.1.f) of the GDPR and article 32 of the GDPR, typified in articles 83.5 and 83.4 of the GDPR, respectively. The startup agreement

pursuant to Article 56 GDPR. It concluded that the controller violated Articles 5(1)(a), 7(3), 9(1), and 13(2)(c), and 17(1) GDPR. It imposed a temporary

Article 58 GDPR Supporting this they, amongst others, used the Case Versalis Spa v Commission, C-511/11, as well as the Recital 40 of the GDPR as basis of

access to said data.” III Violation of article 5.1 f) of the GDPR Article 5.1.f) of the GDPR, Principles relating to processing, states the following: "1

RGPD, it is taken into account Consider what is stated in Recital 39 of the aforementioned GDPR: “39. All processing of personal data must be lawful and

permissible in accordance with Art. 88 GDPR in conjunction with Section 26 BDSG, the violation of the GDPR required for Art. 82 GDPR was already lacking. There is

12(5)(1) GDPR apply. However, it leaves open whether the material scope of application of the GDPR is opened or not opened due to Article 2(2)(a) GDPR. In any

Information Acts and the GDPR. Due to the questions of EU law raised by the case with regard to Article 23(1)(e) GDPR and Article 23(1)(j) GDPR, the BVerwG had

constituted an infringement of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR for violating the principle of confidentiality and Article 32 GDPR for failing to implement appropriate technical

violation of Article 5(1)(e) GDPR and Article 32 GDPR, but the DPA dismissed its previous finding of the Article 5(1)(b) GDPR violation. The DPA found that

according to the first sentence of recital 41 of the GDPR, a legal basis, on which (the here relevant) Art. 9(2)(i) of the GDPR is based, does not necessarily