Search results

Mr. F.F.F. on your SIM cards originals that same day, November 14, 2019, leaving the incidence resolved. Thus, as of the date of this claim, Mr. F.F.F.

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

consequently, dated May 8, 2022, for the purposes provided for in its article 64.2 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Data Protection Agency agreed

complaining party. Consequently, for the purposes provided in its Article 64.2 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Agency for the Protection of

applicableindicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the ProcedureCommon Administrative of Public Administrations, which in its section f)establishes that

the proceedings, the respondent has not submitted The provisions of Article 64 of the Directive apply to this case. Law 39/2015, of 1 October, on the Common

In Consequently, on May 31, 2022, for the purposes provided in its article 64.2 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection agreed

the defendant has not submitted brief of allegations, for which article 64.2.f) of the LPCAP applies, which establishes that in case of not making allegations

applicableindicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the ProcedureCommon Administrative of Public Administrations, which in its section f)establishes that

with the provisions of section 2 of article 56 in in relation to paragraph 1 f) of article 57, both of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament

with the provisions of section 2 of article 56 in in relation to paragraph 1 f) of article 57, both of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament

the almost total identity between its article 7.f) and article 6.1.f) of the RGPD Article 7, letter f) of said Directive indicated: “Member States shall

Consequently, on April 26, 2022, for the purposes provided in its article 64.2 of the LOPDGDD, the Director of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection agreed

complainant filed a complaint with the AEPD, pursuant to Articles 56 and 57(1)(f) GDPR for obstructing his right of access. Could the data controller require

with the provisions of section 2 of article 56 in in relation to paragraph 1 f) of article 57, both of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament

with the provisions of section 2 of article 56 in in relation to paragraph 1 f) of article 57, both of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament

established by Article 5(1)(f) GDPR? Was there a personal data breach? The AEPD considered that there was an infringement of Article 5(1)(f), as there was a leak

with the provisions of section 2 of article 56 in in relation to paragraph 1 f) of article 57, both of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament

of Articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of 1/10 of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

sectors, each of which has its own legal personality and therefore its own C.I.F. and has not maintained any relationship with the claimant. Results of the