Search results

(2) (f) and Article 14 (2) (g), Article 14 (1) andArticle 15 (1) (h) and Article 21 (1)infringement of Article 18 (1) (a) and (d).order the restriction

data Article 9.2.a: Express consent Article 9.2.b: Fulfillment of labor law obligations, etc. Article 9.2.c: Protection of vital interests Article 9.2.d:

" Regarding section k) of article 83.2 of the GDPR, the LOPDGDD, article 76, "Sanctions and corrective measures", provides: "2. In accordance with the provisions

violation of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5 of the GDPR. C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 2/5 FOURTH: On

protected by article 5 par. 1 item a) GDPR, in conjunction with Article 13 GDPR and b) directs a reprimand, according to article 58 par. 2 b) GDPR, to the complained

request an investigation from the inspection service in accordance with Article 63, 2 ° ; 2° request the inspection service to carry out an additional investigation

accordance with Article 9 (1) of the Data Protection Regulation, unless the treatment is not covered by any of the exceptions in Article 9 (2) of the Regulation

institution, organization, etc. Article 9.2.e: Explicit disclosure Article 9.2.g: Substantial public interest Article 9.2.f: Establishment, exercise or support

" Regarding section k) of article 83.2 of the RGPD, the LOPDGDD, article 76, "Sanctions and corrective measures", provides: "2. In accordance with the provisions

previous provisions pursuant to art. 58 of the Regulation (Article 83, paragraph 2, letter e), f), h), i), of the Regulation itself). Based on the aforementioned

constitutes sensitive data within the meaning of Article 9 GDPR. The DPA alluded to Article 9(1) GDPR which prohibits the processing of these special categories

authorization provisions of Article 9. Act no. 90/2018. These include point 6. Article 9 of the Act, cf. point e of the first paragraph. Article 6 of the Regulation

the following: Article 66 GDPR gives the possibility for a procedure of urgency and from this article (and Article 66 and Article 62 GDPR), the European

LPACAP), for the alleged infringement of article 5.1.f) of the RGPD and article 32 of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5 of the RGPD. EIGHTH: Notification

protocols. This therefore breached Article 5(1)(f) GDPR and Article 32 GDPR. The initial sanction for infringing Article 5(1)(f) was a fine of €5000 and the

controller violated Article 6(1)(f) GDPR when accessing the employee's email account and emails. Further, the Datatilsynet breached Article 21 GDPR since the controller

the GDPR, pursuant to Articles 58(2)(b) and (d) respectively. For the violation of Article 5(1)(f), it issued a fine of €10000, pursuant to Article 58(2)(i)

2019, GDPR Art. 37, para. 1; Döpfler , EU-GDPR and BDSG, 2nd edition 2020, GDPR Art. 37, marginal 1; Paal / Pauly, DS-GVO BDSG, 2nd ed. 2018, GDPR Art.

stored or otherwise processed. 2.9 Article 32 GDPR applies to both controllers and processors. Penalties 2.10 Article 83(1) GDPR requires supervisory authorities

the basis of Article 58, paragraph 2, point b) GDPR and Article 100, §1, 5 ° WOG to be reprimanded for the infringement of Article 25 (1) GDPR; b. on the