Search results

for more details. Article 2: Material scope Article 2.2.c: Exclusively personal or domestic activity Article 3: Territorial scope Article 4.1: Personal data

pursuant to Article 17(3)(a) of the GDPR, it is rightly that Google maintained it. 128 SEO No. 3. This referencing refers to an article on the RTL Info

of article 6.1 of the RGPD, typified in article 83.5 of the RGPD, afine of 75,000 euros (seventy-five thousand euros).SECOND: Under article 58.2.d) of

violated Article 6(1)GDPR, for processing personal data without a legal basis. Hence, the AEPD decided to fine Telefónica for the violation of Article 6(1)GDPR

their employees. The DPA found a violation of Article 5(1)(b) GDPR, Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 13 GDPR. Following a visit to the premises of two public

a violation of GDPR Art. 17 and Art. 12(3) & (4). The National Supervisory Authority found that there had been a violation of the GDPR and imposed a fine

company "bieNNova" infringed Article 21 LSSI (Ley de Servicios de Sociedad de la Información y de Comercio Electronico). Article 21 establishes that it is

the light of Article 13 of the AVG. In this respect, the Inspectorate refers to column 3 of the table below.3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Privacy policy

However, the right for deletion could not be granted in accordance with Article 17 GDPR. Resolution No. R/00665/2022 is highlighted by a case concerning a claimant

II.3.3. Regarding the scope of Art. 44 ff GDPR: If the following three requirements are met, there is a transfer and Chapter V (Art. 44 ff) GDPR is applicable

in the need for a confirmation of acceptance and identification (points 3.3 and 3.5.2 of the General Terms and Conditions for letters nationally and point

the authority initiated proceedings for the alleged infringement of Article 5(1)(d) GDPR against the political party aforementioned. The Political party acknowledged

2, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3, 59.3

specified period - article 58. 2 d) -. According to the provisions of article 83.2 of the RGPD, the measure provided for in article 58.2 d) of the aforementioned

volksgezondheid overeenkomstig artikel 9, lid 2, punten h) en i), en artikel 9, lid 3; d) met het oog op archivering in het algemeen belang, wetenschappelijk of historisch

that, due to the application of Article 17.3.b, the complainant cannot invokea reason provided for in article 17.1 or 17.2 for requesting the erasure of

obligations arising from article 12.3 and 4 of the GDPR (methods for exercising the data subject's rights) and Article 15.1.b) and c) 5 of the GDPR (right of access

for erasure within the meaning of Article 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation? 3° Must Article 24 and Article 5(2) of the General Data Protection

protocols. This therefore breached Article 5(1)(f) GDPR and Article 32 GDPR. The initial sanction for infringing Article 5(1)(f) was a fine of €5000 and the

third parties (article 83.2.k, of the GDPR in relation to article 76.2.b, of the LOPDGDD). The Judgment of the National Court of 10/17/2007 (rec. 63/2006)