Search results

publication of the press release of 17 June 2020 infringed Article 54(2) GDPR and Article 48(1) and Article 64(3) WOG. This press release described that the DPA

complaint in accordance with Article 95, §1, 32 WOG, based on the following justification. r PAGE □1- □□□□ 3170578-00 □3-0012- □1- □1-� LCourt of Appeal Brus-e2022/AR/1085-

destruction of personal data on the basis of Article 17(1) of the GDPR in conjunction with Article 7.3.9(1) of the Youth Act is granted. Locations Rechtspraak

6, Section 13, Section 18, Section 31, Section 35 Bankruptcy Act Chapter 1 Section 4, Chapter 2 Section 1 Appeal According to section 25 of the Data Protection

violating Article 5(1)(c) and Article 5(1)(e) GDPR. The DPA of Berlin fined Deutsche Wohnen SE for violating Article 5(1)(c) and Article 5(1)(e) GDPR, because

within the meaning of Article 4 no. 2 of the GDPR and the term "transfer" within the meaning of Article 44 et seq. of the GDPR. GDPR had to be differentiated

analogous to Article 18 (1)(a) GDPR the Court held that § 12 of the German Registration Law explicitly exludes the application of Article 18 (1)(a) GDPR. According

violation of the general right of personality under Article 1.1, Article 2.1 of the Basic Law (Article 7, Article 8 of the Basic Law) was to be taken into account

that a valid legal basis would be either Article 6(1)(c) GDPR, or Article 6(1)(d) GDPR or Article 9(2)(b) GDPR. The Data protection authority (the UOOU)

the data subject can go to the court under Article 79 GDPR in relation to Article 35(1) of the Dutch GDPR Implementation Act and ask the court to order

[appellant sub 1] requested access to the processing of his personal data as referred to in article 35 of the Wbp. According to [Appellant under 1], his personal

07.2097 35 lg 1 p 1235(1)12 of the AvTS § 35 lg 1 p 3, AvTS § Notice of termination of Termination of proceedings personal data protection case 1. The factual

provisions of Article 5.1 of the AVG, but concerns the entire AVG. 31. The aforementioned follows from the merger of Article 5.2 of the AVG and Article 24.1 of the

Art. 82 Para. 1, Para. 2, Art. 5 Para. 1 lit. a Var. 1, Article 6 paragraph 1 subparagraph. 1 lit. 1, Article 6 paragraph 1 subparagraph. 1 lit. a, Art.

the transmitted data (see point II.1.3 or II.1.3.1) at least in combination, personal data according to Art. 4 Z 1 DSGVO. For the lack of an appropriate

the basis of Article62, §1 WOG.4. On 23 August 2019, the Disputes Chamber will decide in accordance with Article 95, §1, 1 ° and Article98 WOG that the

that Meta violated Article 5(1) GDPR and Article 6(1) GDPR. Therefore, the DPA issued a decision under Article 66(1) GDPR and Article 70(1) of Data protection

other legal basis for processing under Article 6 GDPR, the controller had violated Article 5(1)(a) and Article 6(1) GDPR. Taking into account the low income

practice. Recital 1: The protection of natural persons in relation to the processing of personal data is a fundamental right. Article 8(1) of the Charter

grounds under Art. 17 para. 1 lit. c GDPR and Art. 17 para. 1 lit. d GDPR. 14 a) The injunction ground under Art. 17 para. 1 lit. d GDPR does not apply because