Search results

justified, which means that only what has been demanded has to be fulfilled. aa) According to the understanding of the Appeals Chamber, the right to information

CoronaVO is unlikely to succeed (aa). The issue of a temporary injunction is also not required in the above sense (bb). 21 aa) The application for a review

be lawful at the present time. The scope of application of the Act is open (aa). The person summoned is entitled to claim; his request is not abusive (bb)

rights of the Basic Law (aa). This does not affect reserve reservations in the event of a fundamental loss of this protection (bb). 43 aa) The fact that the

administrative files or parts thereof, four different issues must be distinguished: 40 aa) On the one hand, information on data protection law without cause - derived

action is only partially justified. a) The application for 1) is unfounded. aa) On the one hand, the plaintiff is asserting the right to information according

reference is made to the relevant statements in the judgment mentioned. 35 aa) According to Section 24 (2) KSchG, an operation "within the meaning of this

data for "journalistic purposes" within the meaning of Article 38 BayDSG. aa. Although the defendant is to be endorsed at least in so far as such regulations

and province of the holder of said supply point that is required in letter aa) of this same article. d) Town of the supply point, which includes the name

higher-ranking law. c) The regulations mentioned do not violate higher-ranking law. aa) The defendant rebukes without success that the regulations violated the reservation

suffering by the complainant can be considered under Article 82.1 of the GDPR. aa) The District Court should not have decided, without a reference for a preliminary

judgment in its entirety. He alleged a violation: 1.Art. 145 § 1 point 1 of the AA in connection with joke. 134 § 1 of the p.s.a. in connection with joke. 5

the defendant. 32 a) Such a claim would not arise from Art. 82 I GDPR. 33 aa) Based on the plaintiff's submissions, there would already be no violation

70 (1) FamFG. § Section 14 (4) sentence 7 TMG does not indicate otherwise. aa) For the provision of information pursuant to Section 14 (3) of the German

OLG Stuttgart, order of 1 February 1993 - 4 Ss 573/92, MDR 1993, 572). 13 aa) In doing so, the Chamber does not overlook the fact that in the legal literature

the deadline for filing a lawsuit under Section 61 b (1) of the ArbGG. 68 aa) According to Section 61 b Paragraph 1 ArbGG, a claim for compensation according

action is inadmissible as a step action within the meaning of § 254 ZPO. 35 aa) According to § 254 ZPO, the specific indication of the services claimed by

third-country national has committed a serious crime. Such a situation exists here. aa) There is reasonable suspicion against the plaintiff that he was involved

(a) The applicant's request for information is not of a property-law nature. aa) Pecuniary disputes are disputes in which the claims are directed to money

Sections 27 (2), 28 (2), 29 (1) sentence 2 and 34 (1) BDSG" are not enforceable. aa) By referring to other legal regulations, which in turn contain numerous legal