Search results

operations, it is necessary to fall back on article 6.1. AVG and recital 50 GDPR. Recital 50 of the GDPR states that this is a separate legal basis required for

understood as made to the GDPR, in accordance with article 94 of the last. Likewise, it is apparent from recital 173 of the GDPR that this text explicitly

the infringement of its collaboration duties as per Article 58(2) of the GDPR. The decision is the consequence of a complaint submitted by a Spanish citizen

infringement of the data minimisation principle related, as per Article 5(1)(c) GDPR. The decision is the consequence of a complaint submitted by another Spanish

individual for failing to comply with the right to information (Article 13 GDPR) when collecting personal data on its website. A citizen brought to the attention

justification or basis for the processing, violating Article 9 GDPR. AEPD highlighted that Recital 46 GDPR already recognizes that, in exceptional situations, such

warning, in accordance with Article 58(2)(b) of the GDPR, in connection with the above-mentioned Recital 148. Therefore, in accordance with the applicable

under Article 6(1) GDPR. In light of this, the DPA issued a fine of €70,000 to másLUZ Energía (SIE) by virtue of Article 83(5) GDPR for unlawful processing

information.” Recitals 39 and 60 of the GDPR help to specify the scope of the right of information that is given to the interested parties. Recital 39 establishes:

Regulation (EU) 2016/679, of April 27, 2016, General Data Protection (GDPR), in its recital 18, indicates that this Regulation does not apply to the processing

means of such activity, by virtue of article 4.7 of the GDPR. For its part, article 5.1.c) of the GDPR regulates the “principles relating to processing” establishing

consequent infringement of the data minimisation principle (Article 5(1)(c) GDPR). The decision is the consequence of a complaint submitted by a Spanish citizen

is charged with committing an offense for violation of article 6.1 of the GDPR, which states that: "one. The treatment will only be lawful if it complies

they do not involve family law disputes (see Schneider/Herget, loc. cit. recital 4308). bb) Measured against this, there is no objection to the labour court's

consent under Article 4(11) GDPR and Article 6(1) LOPDGDD (National data protection law aimed at the implementation of the GDPR). In both articles, consent

violated the GDPR. A citizen submitted a complaint before the AEPD stating that privacy policy of www.banderacatalana.cat did not comply with the GDPR. GRUP BC

as “anonymisation”. Recital 26 of the GDPR clarifies that anonymous information does not fall within the scope of the GDPR. The GDPR does not explicitly

of the general information duty included in Article 13 GDPR. Is this a violation of Article 13 GDPR? The AEPD held that there had been a violation of Article

doubts about the identity of the person making the request”. Moreover, Recital 64 GDPR require the measures adopted to identify data subjects to be “reasonable”

account data under Article 15 GDPR? Is GDPR applicable to a case that was still pending before the DPA on 25. 5. 2018? GDPR applies to cases pending before