Search results
From GDPRhub
- OGH - 6Ob56/21k (request for preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU) (category Article 5(1)(c) GDPR)member states is superimposed (see Recital 146 S 4 and 5 on the GDPR; cf. also Frenzel in Paal / Pauly, GDPR-BDSG3 Art 82 GDPR margin no.1; Wybitul / Haß / Albrecht122 KB (20,253 words) - 08:17, 19 August 2021
- CNIL (France) - SAN-2021-024 (section The material competence of the CNIL and the non-application of the "one-stop shop" mechanism provided for by the GDPR)understood as references to the GDPR, in accordance with Article 94 of the latter. 34. Similarly, it follows from recital 173 of the GDPR that this text explicitly82 KB (13,428 words) - 17:02, 6 December 2023
- FG München - Auskunftsanspruch nach Art. 15 DSGVO (category Article 15(3) GDPR)(4.2) Exclusions (4.2.1) GDPR and AO restrictions 145 According to Art. 15 Para. 1 GDPR, the person concerned (Art. 4 No. 1 GDPR) has a right to information97 KB (16,519 words) - 09:57, 22 February 2023
- APD/GBA (Belgium) - 37/2020 (category Article 17 GDPR)serious breach of the GDPR. The violation of Article 17, 1., a) constitutes also a violation of an essential principle of the GDPR and constitutes at least131 KB (22,429 words) - 16:57, 12 December 2023
- APD/GBA (Belgium) - 24/2021 (category Article 6 GDPR)Article 6.1 GDPR, read in conjunction with Articles 5.2 GDPR and 24.1 GDPR; 5) the performance of a data protection impact assessment (Article 35 GDPR) the framework110 KB (18,238 words) - 16:56, 12 December 2023
- CNIL (France) - SAN-2020-008 (category Article 5(1)(e) GDPR)violation of Article 12 GDPR ? Are the following practices an infringement on data subjects' information right as described in Article 12 GDPR ? Spreading the104 KB (16,646 words) - 17:09, 6 December 2023
- CNIL (France) - SAN-2021-023 (category Article 56 GDPR) (section The material competence of the CNIL and the non-application of the "one-stop shop" mechanism provided for by the GDPR)understood as made to the GDPR , in accordance with Article 94 of the latter. Similarly, it appears from recital 173 of the GDPR that this text explicitly120 KB (19,650 words) - 09:00, 6 April 2022
- AEPD (Spain) - PS/00240/2019 (category Article 5(1)(b) GDPR)principle enclosed in Article 5(1)(b) GDPR. On this matter, the AEPD argued that, according to Article 5(1)(a) GDPR, Recital 39 and Article 6(1)(f), an interest602 KB (102,229 words) - 14:21, 13 December 2023
- VG Berlin - 1 K 391/20 (category Article 91(1) GDPR)also supported by Recital 128 GDPR. Therefore, the court found the independent nature of the church supervisory authorities to be GDPR-compliant. Second36 KB (5,768 words) - 14:17, 18 May 2022
- IMY (Sweden) - DI-2020-10547 (category Article 6(1) GDPR)DPA initiated supervision pursuant to Article 56 GDPR in accordance with the Article 60 GDPR cooperation mechanism. The handover of the complaint was made37 KB (4,294 words) - 15:52, 25 October 2022
- WSA Warsaw - II SA/Wa 1340/20 (category Article 6(1) GDPR)of Warsaw held that a car rental company could not rely on Article 6(1)(f) GDPR to process a customer's personal data with the view of defending itself against25 KB (4,078 words) - 09:32, 26 November 2021
- BVwG - W256 2214855-1/6E (category Article 6(1)(f) GDPR)(1) Data Protection Act - Next search term). 3 Previous search termGDPR; see also Recital 211: "This impact assessment should in particular address the measures27 KB (4,149 words) - 16:02, 22 March 2022
- APD/GBA (Belgium) - 04/2021 (category Article 5(1) GDPR)the provisions of the GDPR, in particular Article 5 (1) GDPR, article 24 and article 28 GDPR, all this based on article 58.2, d) GDPR and article 100, §1113 KB (18,732 words) - 16:50, 12 December 2023
- IMY (Sweden) - DI-2021-6140 (category Article 12(3) GDPR)Swedish DPA held that a controller violated Article 12(3) GDPR by not responding to an Article 15 GDPR access request within the one month time limit. However42 KB (4,784 words) - 08:22, 20 October 2022
- OLG Köln - 15 U 89/19 (category Article 17(3) GDPR)Article 17(3) GDPR. Two doctors sued a platform for deletion of their basic profile set up on the platform without their consent under Article 17 GDPR. They argued143 KB (24,273 words) - 15:59, 10 March 2022
- LG Hannover - 13 O 129/21 (category Article 82(1) GDPR)Article 82(1) GDPR, because the controller unlawfully disclosed the data to its customers. The court also held that under Article 82 GDPR the violation28 KB (4,506 words) - 11:20, 4 November 2022
- APD/GBA (Belgium) - 21/2022 (category Article 5(1)(f) GDPR) (section Accountability (Article 24 GDPR), data protection by design and by default (Article 25 GDPR), integrity and confidentiality (Article 5(1)(f) GDPR), as well as security of processing (Article 32 GDPR))243. In order to strengthen the enforcement of the rules of the GDPR, recital 148 GDPR clarifies that penalties, including administrative fines, should429 KB (58,279 words) - 09:12, 2 November 2022
- addition to or instead of the appropriate measures imposed. 79 This same recital 79Recital148 states that in this context: "In order to strengthen the enforcement206 KB (30,485 words) - 09:54, 14 December 2023
- LG Frankfurt am Main - 2-03 O 48/19 (category Article 16 GDPR)regarded as an offer to conclude an amendment agreement within the meaning of § 145 BGB. A contract concluded by clicking on a button has in principle an individual66 KB (10,899 words) - 08:33, 8 September 2021
- CNPD (Portugal) - Deliberação 2022/1072 (category Article 9(1) GDPR)therefore violated Articles 9(1) GDPR out of negligence. The DPA fined the controller €1,600,000 pursuant of Article 83(5)(a) GDPR and considered this a high163 KB (27,222 words) - 16:54, 6 December 2023