Search results

device), which is an omission which cannot amount to data processing. 31. I am not satisfied that it is appropriate to grant the defendant summary judgment

European Case Law Identifier: Appeal from: LG Frankfurt (Germany) LG Frankfurt am Main 2-03 O 190/16 Appeal to: Appealed - Overturned OLG Frankfurt (Germany)

letter read as follows: “Ladies and Gentlemen, Dear Friends, Dear Friends, I am proud to be the [Xth] candidate of the [Y] list for our borough [list of communes

Vassiliou Avramidis (with AM ...), and the complainant through the lawyers Menelaos Karpathakis (with AM ...) and Vassiliou Saliaris (with AM ...), also attended

messages and in one of them, an Alert from Banco de Santander, tells me that I am realizing- I make a transfer from my online banking and, if not, put me contact

been convicted by any other court judgment of § 2 of the Penal Code. 121, I am still entered in the national criminal record as a convicted person for physical

Protection Agency (hereinafter AEPD) for receipt on January 31 2020, at 11:34 am, from a commercial call on behalf of “Vodafone España, S.A.U. ”, with NIF

I not I have subscribed, nor confirmed that email that they sent me, but I am subscribed in the Robinson list, attached certificate certifying it. I request

The Regional Court Frankfurt am Main (LG Frankfurt am Main) decided that the person affected by illegal data processing (outside the journalistic/editorial

decision. The Supreme Regional Court of Frankfurt (Oberlandgericht Frankfurt am Main) rejected the data subject’s appeal. According to the court, the legal

requirement violates Article 6 GDPR. The Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main (OLG Frankfurt) balanced the interests of the parties pursuant to Article

The Administrative Court Frankfurt am Main rejected a data subject's claim for injunctive relief against the processing of personal data by the Federal

request to delete it). Deleting the account is just one element of my request. I am waiting for the next part to be completed. First of all, you have not read

only interested in sensational journalism and we're not working on that. I am very disappointed with your organization, the Dagblad van het Noorden and

the applicant brought an action before the administrative court in Frankfurt am Main, filed under reference number 5 K 1094/22.F, because of the data transfer

of players who are not blocked. Procedure for the time being LG Frankfurt am Main, December 12, 2018, 3-8 O 42/17, Judgment Tenor The appeal of the defendants

The Administrative Court Frankfurt am Main (VG Frankfurt am Main) held that acts of European legislation have uniform and direct effect. The Government

A court in Frankfurt (LG Frankfurt am Main) held that according to the terms and conditions of a social network, an operator may ask a user to prove their

in detail her. The complainant appeared, through her lawyer, Sofia D. Mila (AM ...) and supported what she had previously stated in writing, arguing that

The Higher Regional Court in Frankfurt am Main (OLG Frankfurt am Main) dismissed an appeal brought by a doctor against an online evaluation portal, holding