Search results
From GDPRhub
- OLG Brandenburg - 12 W 23/22 (category OLG Brandenburg (Germany))such lawsuits. Occasionally, a value interest of only €500.00 is assumed (LG Bonn, judgment of July 1st, 2021, Az. 15 O 355/20; LAG Berlin-Brandenburg12 KB (1,921 words) - 08:11, 5 September 2022
- LG Regensburg - 75 O 1040/23 (category LG Regensburg (Germany))thus also of the GDPR (LG Munich I, judgment of December 9, 2021, case number: 31 O 16606/20, BKR 2022, 131, marginal no. 38; LG Essen judgment of November47 KB (7,691 words) - 10:16, 12 June 2024
- OLG Köln - 15 U 137/21 (category OLG Köln (Germany))also LAG Hamm, judgment of May 11, 2021 - 6 Sa 1260/20, juris; also OLG Stuttgart, judgment of March 31, 2021 - 9 U 34/21 , juris para. 29; cf. also Weber31 KB (5,138 words) - 08:10, 5 September 2022
- LG Rostock - 3 O 762/19 (category LG Rostock (Germany))The regional court of Rostock (LG Rostock) held that tracking cookies can only be placed with the user's active consent. A preset permission that is only103 KB (16,959 words) - 13:58, 20 September 2021
- OLG Hamm - 11 U 88/22 (category OLG Hamm (Germany))here is culpability in the sense of German legal terminology and not responsibility under data protection law (LG Mainz, judgment of November 12, 202185 KB (14,523 words) - 05:28, 26 April 2023
- OLG Celle - 8 U 165/22 (category OLG Celle (Germany))substantially diverged from the prevailing German case law at the time (see OLG Köln - 20 U 295/21, OLG Dresden - 4 U 1905/21, LG Krefeld - 2 O 448/20). Share blogs62 KB (10,852 words) - 14:08, 7 January 2023