Search results

in accordance with article 89.2 in relation to art. 73.1 of the LPACAP). R.R.R.INSPECTOR/INSTRUCTOR>>SECOND: On August 2, 2019, VODAFONE ONO, S.A.U. has

follows with regard to X: Appeal request fee: 20.00 euros procedural indemnity: 1,440.00 euros Total: 1,460.00 euros ” The Data Protection Authority (APD} requests

of the appeal, settled at 1,560.00 euros (400.00 right of appeal + 20.00 euro contribution to the Budgetary Fund + 1440.00 administration of justice compensation

October 1966 - 2 BvR 506/63, NJW 1967, 195; judgment of 30 June 1976 - 2 BvR 435/76, NJW 1976, 1883; order of 14 July 1981 - 1 BvR 575/80). This therefore

April 2016 - VI R 61/13 -, juris, marginal 21 et seq.BVerfG, order of the First Chamber of the First Senate of 25 February 1993 - 1 BvR 172/93 -, juris

details. [doc. web n. 9779057] Order injunction against Società Ospedale San Raffaele s.r.l. - April 28, 2022 Record of measures n. 164 of 22 April 2022

to apply to Concentrix Cvg Italy s.r.l. the administrative sanction of the payment of a sum equal to EUR 20,000.00 (twenty thousand). In this context,

file number            N02 26Date of default                            00.00.0000 27Receipt date                            00.00.0000 28Responsible Cr

2001, Zl. 2001/04/0034 mwN, VwGH, 28.10.2008, Zl. 2008/05/0129). European Case Law Identifier ECLI:AT:BVWG:2021:W211.2222613.2.00

Newsletter of 10 September 2021 [doc. web n. 9698724] Injunction order against Roma Capitale - 22 July 2021 Record of measures n. 294 of 22 July 2021 THE GUARANTOR

attendance officer, awarded legal costs of € 534.00 and the penalty forfeited due to late decision set at € 1,442.00. The rejection of the request to provide access

reference numbers r / EI:E / 5648 / 26-06-2018, r / EI:E / 5650 / 26-06-2018, r / EI:E / 5651 I 26-06-20 l 8, r / EI:E / 5653 / 26-06-2018, r / EI:E / 5679

only provisionally (see BVerfG, Order of 19.10.2006 - 2 BvR 2023/06, juris, marginal no. 13, EuR 2006, 814).

aepd.es 28001 – Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 10/13 SECOND: APPOINT as instructor R.R.R. and, as secretary, to S.S.S., indicating that any of them may be challenged

processing of personal data relating to an employee. Ms. XX, an employee of TB s.r.l., claims a violation of her data protection rights following the posting

Protection Agency. claims her- tion is directed against COMMUNITY OF OWNERS R.R.R. with NIF ***NIF.1 (in below, the claimed party). The reasons on which the

of the persons in charge of the processing, referred to in the rules n. 12 and n. 13 of the aforementioned technical specification. The documentation acquired

the AEPD for sending SPAM in procedures PS / 00451/2016 (R / 00277/2017) and PS / 00176/2018 (R / 00955/2018). In addition, surprisingly, this same company

OPERATION, SLU, view the complaint submitted by COMMUNIDAD DE PROPIETARIOS R.R.R, and based on the following, FIRST BACKGROUND: On January 7, 2020, the Director

disclosure (BGH, judgement of 18.01.1994 - 1 StR 745/93 - BGHSt 40, 60; decision of 05.09.2000 - 1 StR 325/00 - NJW 2001, 695). The judge is allowed and ordered