Search results

DIGITAL VIRGO ESPAÑA, S.A sent written response, establishing that the owner of the line under investigation was BUBO MEDIA, S.L. by virtue of a contract

of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection in the banking entity CAIXABANK, S.A., indicating in the C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd

statement that in practice, they allowed access more than once per year and don't charge for requests made per mail. Stating their intention was to prevent

of the Spanish Agency for Data Protection in the banking entity CAIXABANK, S.A.. Otherwise, we will proceed to its collection in the executive period. Once

The Spanish DPA (AEPD) decided to impose a warning on Add Event Staff, S.L. for infringing of Article 7 GDPR by not gathering consent separately for different

Protection Agency. The claim is directed against BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA, S.A., with NIF A48265169 (hereinafter, the claimed party or BBVA). The grounds

Articles 6 and 7 GDPR. The Spanish DPA (AEPD) launched an investigation on Orange's marketing practices after several complainants lodged a complaint with the

installation of any device, nor being responsible for the placement of the camera(s) object of the denouncement. III It should be noted that this body is unable

DPA (AEPD) imposed two fines (€20,000 each) on Miraclia Telecomunicaciones, S.L. for use without consent, record and assignment of personal data in the context

According to the CNPD, the processing is particularly sensitive, so the controller's failure to justify its necessity and proportionality reveals that it was unnecessary

the existing jurisprudence on this issue, in which the 2nd Chamber of the T.S. has been affirming that the recording of the image of people in open spaces

remove appellant's personal data from the internal register. Appellant is a customer of ING who had his personal data registered in ING's Internal Referral

subject’s telephone number, however, was listed in an official “Do-not-call” registry. The controller stated that it did not know data subject’s name, and

decision. The data controller maintains documents indicating the competent person(s) within it to issue authorization to access the data, the list of authorized

this Agency by Ms. A.A.A., (from now the complainant), against CAIXABANK, S.A. (now the claimed), because their right of access has not been duly attended

Justice and Security, Repatriation and Departure Service, defendant (Agent: S. Raterink). Process By decision of 18 April 2019 (primary decision), the defendant

mani�on of work. Maybe a k/eine remark: I'm 51 years old and I really don't look like a/s anyone of 16 years of age:) In other words, the person concerned agreed

for the controller’s data processing activities under the GDPR's "one-stop-shop" mechanism. The Italian DPA acknowledged the Irish DPA’s position in its decision

"electronic communication service provider" under 50 U.S. Code § 1881(b)(4), it is subject to surveillance by U.S. intelligence services and can be ordered to disclose

in its content. b) Copy of the evaluation / s of the impact on the protection of personal data relative / s to any type of personal data processing operations