Search results

matter of the complaint must be investigated with all due diligence. Case law: In case C-362/14 - Schrems CJEU considered that where a person lodges with

resonates these case law. The concept is flexible and appropriate to ensure effective and complete protection of the individual. Case law: In Weltimmo

the proceedings in front of the Danish Data Protection Authority. As the case is sent over to the police and brought in front of the Court, the general

as to what "effective" means can be found in the CJEU's case-law under Article 47 CFR. The case-law includes statutory rules about appointment of the judges

GDPR CJEU, Case C-101/01 Lindqvist, 6 November 2003 (available here). CJEU, Case C-101/01 Lindqvist, 6 November 2003, margin number 90. CJEU, Case C-101/01

the EDPB notes that this ground only applies in cases where there is no criminal offence (in which case  Article 23(1)(d) GDPR would also apply). This ground

such as a civil law contract for the benefit of third parties, which in this case would be the data subjects. A further condition for the application of the

CJEU, Case C-7/68, Commission v Italy, 10 December 1968 (available here); CJEU, Case C-50/80, Horvath, 5 February 1981 (available here); CJEU, Case C-421/09

(Oxford University Press 2020). Also, see Case C-131/12, Google Spain, para 48; and Case C-230/14, Weltimmo, para 28. Case C-131/12, Google Spain, para 55. Bergt

by a majority of three members. In case of a tie the case is referred to the plenary. The section may refer a case to the plenary, which has always the

the adequacy decision. Whether there is a duly justified case must be decided on a case-by-case basis. Article 45(6) GDPR establishes that following the

ensure "effective case processing", the DPA encourages that the data subject first contacts the controller to try to resolve the case, as well as attaching

criteria for mandatory designation are met (see below, In any case where). In certain cases, either the controller or the processor alone may be required

12 months. However, in this case, the Garante must motivate the complexity and communicate it to the data subjects . In case of cooperation procedure, such

Category:Article 52 GDPR Case C-518/07, Commisson v Germany; Case C-614/10, Commission v Austria; and Case C-288/12, Commission v Hungary. See CJEU, case C-518/07 -

in your case: The often "close" cases when the controller complies with the law during the procedure. The law allows for such "healing" of a case. However

operations that a controller can perform on their personal data. In such case, the controller is only allowed to passively store the personal data, but

processor. In both cases there would have to exist a contract between the documenting processor and the orher processor or processors, in which case their identity

concerned, by the procedure in the case of Article 65(1)(a) GDPR. However, the definition of SA concerned is less clear in the case of a binding decision adopted

shall inform the requesting supervisory authority of the results or, as the case may be, of the progress of the measures taken in order to respond to the