Search results

Rb. Amsterdam - c/13/673085 / HA ZA 19-340
lodged by [the applicant] against the decision of the District Court of Noord Holland of 14 March 2019. In the e-mail messages referred to under 1.1. dated

25 KB (4,071 words) - 13:55, 20 September 2021
Rb. Rotterdam - ROT 21/3636
trespassing/local trespassing committed by the father ([name of plaintiff]) at the Noord police station) [the court understands: [name of plaintiff] ]. Those involved

44 KB (7,375 words) - 13:24, 27 April 2022
RvS (Netherlands) - 202006082/1/A3
Number/Name: 202006082/1/A3 European Case Law Identifier: Appeal from: Rb. Noord-Nederland (Netherlands) 19/2909 Appeal to: Unknown Original Language(s):

21 KB (3,219 words) - 12:03, 11 August 2021
Rb. Gelderland - 8500601
Therefore, the breach of the GDPR is not further discussed. in Rechtbank Noord-Nederland; 15-01-2020; C / 18 / 189406 / HA ZA 19-6 the Administrative District

26 KB (3,614 words) - 15:59, 12 June 2021
RvS - 202001436/1/A2
articles of the AVG could be regarded as legally complex. The decisions of the Noord-Holland District Court of 23 May 2019 and the Amsterdam District Court of

21 KB (3,368 words) - 20:43, 26 July 2020
Rb. Amsterdam - AWB - 20 1863 - AMS 20/1863
Hague of 17 September 2019, ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2019:2398, and the judgment of the Noord-Holland District Court of 23 May 2019, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2019:4283. 3.2. According

24 KB (3,724 words) - 09:21, 21 December 2022
PHR - 22/01253
administrative aspects of the GDPR', NTB 2022, p. 240-241. 176 See for example Rb. Noord-Holland 23 May 2019, ECLI:NL:RBNHO:2019:4283, JBP 2019/59 m.nt. M.P.M. Hennekens

241 KB (42,617 words) - 14:14, 13 September 2022