Search results

time limit for lodging an appeal (cf. § 90.1, 2 and § 93 of the BVerfGG). 38 The complainant is also entitled to lodge a complaint. He complains of an

the ePrivacy Directive and Articles 6(1)(a) and 7 GDPR, in the lights of Article 4(11) and Recital 32 GDPR. Following this report, the GBA issued a decision

the GDPR also applied to facts before the above-mentioned date. The Court noted that the entry-into-force of the GDPR according to Article 99 GDPR represents

controller/employer, the free of the worker's consent can be questioned (Recital 43 of the GDGR and opinion of the Group of Article 29" on data protection

para. of the GDPR, the law or regulation that constitutes the legal basis referred to in letters c) and e) of co. 1 of art. 6 of the GDPR, could contain

deal with them, however, the ECtHR pointed out that the mere fact that Page 38 38any information available to the public does not necessarily exclude it from

account". 81. The restricted formation recalls that, according to recital 38 of the GDPR, "children deserve specific protection with regard to their personal

15(1)(h) GDPR is not limited to cases of Article 22 GDPR but also applies in other cases of purely automated processing, as Article 15(1)(h) GDPR uses the

review under Article 78 GDPR. The disputed infringement occurred before the GDPR came into legal force according to Article 99 GDPR. Therefore, the data subject's

17 of the AVG) are included below. Recital 59 of the GDPR further clarifies the standard in Article 12 of the GDPR: Arrangements should be made available

Article 83.4.a of the GDPR. Assessing the circumstances modifying liability, both adverse and favourable, contemplated in article 83.2 GDPR, the AEPD established

paragraph 1 GDPR and Article 25 (1) GDPR 84. Based on Article 12(1) GDPR, Article 13(1) and (2) GDPR and Article 14(1) and paragraph 2 of the GDPR, it is necessary

member states is superimposed (see Recital 146 S 4 and 5 on the GDPR; cf. also Frenzel in Paal / Pauly, GDPR-BDSG3 Art 82 GDPR margin no.1; Wybitul / Haß / Albrecht

effectiveness of the GDPR. Third, the CJEU looked at the context of Article 38(3) GDPR and noted that, according to Article 39(1)(b) GDPR, the task of the

personal data, in breach of Article 32(1)(b) GDPR and Article 32(2) GDPR. The DPA emphasised, referring to recital 38, that children need specific protection

(Article 32 GDPR); the DPO of the hospital was not directly reporting to the highest management level of within the organization (Article 38(3) GDPR). The Belgian

consent under Article 8 GDPR also apply? Did the defendant, as the controller, fail to adhere to the data transparency (Article 5(1)(a) GDPR) and the data minimisation

children's personal data (requiring special protection, as mentioned in recital 38 of Regulation 2016/679). It should also be noted that at no stage of [

Article 23 GDPR. Restrictions on the right to information under Art. 15 GDPR result in particular from the express provision in Art. 15 (4) GDPR that the

not compliant with Article 13 GDPR. The CNPD held that the controller infringed Article 5(1)(c) GDPR and Article 13 GDPR and decided to: - impose an administrative