7 December 2022
- 10:4110:41, 7 December 2022 diff hist −514 m NSA - III OSK 25287/21 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 10:2110:21, 7 December 2022 diff hist −1 m NAIH (Hungary) - NAIH-4667-10/2022 →Holding current Tag: Visual edit
- 10:2010:20, 7 December 2022 diff hist +199 NAIH (Hungary) - NAIH-4667-10/2022 clarified which data was provided by the processor (Holding) and changed the short summary Tag: Visual edit
- 10:0510:05, 7 December 2022 diff hist +59 AEPD (Spain) - EXP202210237 →Facts: clarified which traffic offence - lack of compulsory insurance Tag: Visual edit
- 09:2109:21, 7 December 2022 diff hist +334 m AEPD (Spain) - EXP202202837 →Holding: clarified the holding part about the non bis in idem principle Tag: Visual edit
- 09:1509:15, 7 December 2022 diff hist −10 m AEPD (Spain) - EXP202202837 changed short summary to catch the reader's eye more Tag: Visual edit
- 09:0209:02, 7 December 2022 diff hist +182 AEPD (Spain) - EXP202201667 →Facts: clarified the 6 email addresses situation in the facts Tag: Visual edit
- 08:5008:50, 7 December 2022 diff hist +4 m Datatilsynet (Norway) - 22/03622 clarified which parties had a meeting in august Tag: Visual edit
6 December 2022
- 16:1216:12, 6 December 2022 diff hist −2,760 Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9827446 had to shorten both facts and holding, no need to put a full paragraph on aggravating and mitigating circumstances in the applications of a fine; rather the reasoning on Article 9 could have been elaborated on; good short summary and overall well-written just too long Tag: Visual edit
- 15:0615:06, 6 December 2022 diff hist −20 NAIH (Hungary) - NAIH-4667-10/2022 changed the summary to more clearly describe most important takeaways from the case, fixed hyperlinks in the holding, changed chronological order of facts (what happened prior to filing the complaint), also no need to write a separate sentence on who the parties in the case are, it is enough to integrate it in the facts, use the term 'controller' instead of 'data controller', edited the holding to contain more relevant information on the substantive assessment; use DPA instead of Authority Tag: Visual edit
- 10:4210:42, 6 December 2022 diff hist +267 m AEPD (Spain) - EXP202210237 adjusted the legal terminology in the name of the parties and re-worked the short summary. Otherwise a very well summarised decision! Tag: Visual edit
- 10:1410:14, 6 December 2022 diff hist +164 m AEPD (Spain) - EXP202201667 adjusted the fine sum, changed some sentences to make them sound more clear, moved the information about the fine form facts to holding as it considers a substantive assessment. Otherwise, great summary! Tag: Visual edit
- 09:1409:14, 6 December 2022 diff hist −139 AEPD (Spain) - EXP202202837 simplified the facts by shortening the last paragraph. Clarified some sentences in the holding and fixed some hyperlinks. Otherwise, well-explained summary Tag: Visual edit
5 December 2022
- 15:5515:55, 5 December 2022 diff hist −34 m AEPD (Spain) - EXP202202837 clarified the facts - chronological order Tag: Visual edit
- 12:2712:27, 5 December 2022 diff hist +136 m NSA - III OSK 25287/21 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 08:3608:36, 5 December 2022 diff hist −7 m Datatilsynet (Norway) - 22/03622 changed holding to past tense, added 'GDPR' to provisions Tag: Visual edit
2 December 2022
- 14:0914:09, 2 December 2022 diff hist +283 NSA - III OSK 25287/21 →Holding Tag: Visual edit
- 14:0414:04, 2 December 2022 diff hist +108 m NSA - III OSK 25287/21 →Holding Tag: Visual edit
- 14:0114:01, 2 December 2022 diff hist +62,612 N NSA - III OSK 25287/21 Created page with "{{COURTdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Poland |Court-BG-Color= |Courtlogo=Courts_logo1.png |Court_Abbrevation=NSA |Court_Original_Name=Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny |Court_English_..." Tag: submission [1.0]
1 December 2022
- 13:5713:57, 1 December 2022 diff hist +639 AEPD (Spain) - EXP202204515 See the Style Guide (https://gdprhub.eu/index.php?title=GDPRhub_style_guide) for an example of how we write short summaries, • Very very very well done • Basically I only changed YOIGO to “the controller” for consistency matters Holding: • For the future, elaborate a bit more on the applicable law, especially GDPR provisions • Try to avoid passive tense and use active instead: so rather than “it was held”, say “the DPA held that”, Well-written part about the imposition of the fine Tag: Visual edit
29 November 2022
- 14:5514:55, 29 November 2022 diff hist −13 m DSB (Austria) - 2022-0.332.606 removed the name of the parties Tag: Visual edit
- 12:5112:51, 29 November 2022 diff hist −4 m AEPD (Spain) - PS/00587/2021 changed employee to nurse in short summary to make it more 'practical' current Tag: Visual edit
- 12:4712:47, 29 November 2022 diff hist +1,472 DSB (Austria) - 2022-0.332.606 re-wrote the summary; added more details to the facts and wrote a more extensive holding which explained the reasoning of the DPA, added hyperlinks to GDPR Articles Tag: Visual edit
- 10:3810:38, 29 November 2022 diff hist −581 m AEPD (Spain) - PS/00587/2021 added GDPR articles to short summary; shortened facts and changed chronological order (see first sentence), great and detailed holding - minor linguistic and style changes Tag: Visual edit
28 November 2022
- 17:1317:13, 28 November 2022 diff hist +124 m AEPD (Spain) - EXP202203617 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 17:0217:02, 28 November 2022 diff hist +64 m AEPD (Spain) - EXP202200471 added fine amount and GDPR Articles to the short summary, made some stylistic changes to facts and holding, also changed chronological order (just moved the first sentence) in the facts, excellent holding and well-described facts Tag: Visual edit
- 16:1416:14, 28 November 2022 diff hist +797 AKI (Estonia) - 2.1.-1/22/1396 Short summary: • DPA or Estonian DPA instead of Data Protection Inspectorate • Check style guide for how to format currency and fines • Otherwise good short summary but it would be useful to mention that the DPA both issued a warning and an injunction against processing activities of the controller in order to convey the most important takeaways of the decision Facts: • Use chronological order – so instead of starting with ‘data subject filed a complaint’ first explain what led to the complain Tag: Visual edit
24 November 2022
- 15:1915:19, 24 November 2022 diff hist −2 m AEPD (Spain) - EXP202203617 replaced employee with data subject where relevant, formatted the amount of the fine Tag: Visual edit
- 09:1409:14, 24 November 2022 diff hist +117 AEPD (Spain) - EXP202202889 Short summary: • Spanish DPA instead of AEPD • Very good short summary! Conveys all most important parts of the decision, potentially you can also add the relevant GDPR Article, in this case Article 15 GDPR (with a hyperlink) Facts: • “Data subject” instead of complainant • “Controller” instead of defendant • This is a relatively simple case so, indeed, you do not need to elaborate much more. Usually however, especially for the newsletter, min 3-4 sentences would be good Tag: Visual edit
23 November 2022
- 13:0913:09, 23 November 2022 diff hist +5,824 HDPA (Greece) - 3/2022 →English Machine Translation of the Decision: added automated translation! Very important to have this in the initial submission form because it is difficult to add later current Tag: Visual edit
- 13:0813:08, 23 November 2022 diff hist +576 HDPA (Greece) - 3/2022 Changed complainant to data subject and mobile service provider to controller; added more detailed reasoning to the Holding, the facts should only contain the background to the decision and any assessment of the law by the DPA should be in the Holding; formatting of GDPR Article was incorrect - see Style Guide Tag: Visual edit
22 November 2022
- 17:2317:23, 22 November 2022 diff hist +1 m Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2021-41-0149 →Holding: changed the phrasing in the second sentence of the facts and in the holding added the correct legal basis: 6(1)(a) instead of just 6(1) as it was too general current Tag: Visual edit
- 14:2814:28, 22 November 2022 diff hist −33 m UODO (Poland) - DKN.5131.8.2022 →Facts Tag: Visual edit
- 14:2414:24, 22 November 2022 diff hist +73 m Datatilsynet (Norway) - 21/01057 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 14:2014:20, 22 November 2022 diff hist −7 m AEPD (Spain) - EXP202104875 →Facts Tag: Visual edit
- 12:4512:45, 22 November 2022 diff hist +40 m UODO (Poland) - DKN.5131.8.2022 →Holding Tag: Visual edit
- 12:3812:38, 22 November 2022 diff hist +49,329 N UODO (Poland) - DKN.5131.8.2022 Created page with "{{DPAdecisionBOX |Jurisdiction=Poland |DPA-BG-Color=background-color:#ffffff; |DPAlogo=LogoPL.png |DPA_Abbrevation=UODO |DPA_With_Country=UODO (Poland) |Case_Number_Name=DKN..." Tag: submission [1.0]
- 09:3809:38, 22 November 2022 diff hist +2,868 Datatilsynet (Norway) - 21/01057 changed the short summary around. Norwergian Privacy Appeals Board instead of tribunal; clear and well written facts but I added the decision of the DPA to the facts. Since it it an appeal, only the decision and reasoning of the board should be in the Holding, the rest is factual background; changed formatting of GDPR Articles - see Style Guide, usually we just say Norwegian DPA or DPA instead of the full name - good summary but pay attention whether it is an appeal and correct name of authority Tag: Visual edit
17 November 2022
- 16:2316:23, 17 November 2022 diff hist +220 ANSPDCP (Romania) - Das Sense Society SRL changed the short summary to make it more specific - who requested the information and in which context, organised the facts in chronological order, rephrased the holding slightly mainly linguistically current Tag: Visual edit
- 16:0516:05, 17 November 2022 diff hist −2 m Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2021-41-0149 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 16:0516:05, 17 November 2022 diff hist +1 m Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2021-41-0149 small linguistic and stylistic changes to the short summary, facts and holding Tag: Visual edit
16 November 2022
- 12:5212:52, 16 November 2022 diff hist −18 m GDPRhub style guide →Short summary Tag: Visual edit
- 12:4812:48, 16 November 2022 diff hist +5,760 GDPRhub style guide updated with specific information on each of the sections in the summary Tag: Visual edit
- 08:3808:38, 16 November 2022 diff hist +29 Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9815665 shortened the short summary, reworked the facts to be in chronological order, reworked the English mainly adding 'that' so that sentences are a bit more clear for non-native speakers current Tag: Visual edit
15 November 2022
- 16:3216:32, 15 November 2022 diff hist +4,505 HDPA (Greece) - 24/2022 added machine translation current Tag: Visual edit
- 16:3116:31, 15 November 2022 diff hist +146 DBEB/AVPD (Basque Country) - DICTAMEN No D22-013 added to the comment section current Tag: Visual edit
- 16:2216:22, 15 November 2022 diff hist −3 m AEPD (Spain) - PS/00183/2022 No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 16:2116:21, 15 November 2022 diff hist +101 AEPD (Spain) - PS/00183/2022 added more chronological order to the facts Tag: Visual edit
- 16:1416:14, 15 November 2022 diff hist −453 HDPA (Greece) - 24/2022 changed short summary, rearranged and clarified facts and holding, some elements of the facts were moved to the holding as they concern substantive issues, no automated translation Tag: Visual edit
- 15:4415:44, 15 November 2022 diff hist +107 Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9815665 changed the short summary a bit so that is includes the imposed fine, made some slight linguistic changes to the facts and holding - otherwise great summary Tag: Visual edit
