Search results

referred to in Article 10, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree no. 150 of 1/9/2011 provided for the lodging of the appeal as indicated below (Article 166, paragraph

based on a legitimate interest under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, so that the principle of lawfulness under Article 5(1)(a) GDPR is violated. This is due to the fact

more details. Article 2: Substantive scope Article 2.2.c: Exclusively personal or domestic activity Article 3: Territorial scope Article 4.1: Personal

the general rule of Article 15 (1) (a), c) and d) of the GDPR by not giving substantive, specific answers to the request under Article 15 and by sharing

requests it. ". 26. Article D. 213-1 of the same code provides that "[t]he amount mentioned in article L. 213-1 is set at 120 euros" and article D. 213-2 provides

information under Article 13 GDPR is illegal. Consequently, the APED decided to issue a fine of €1.500 for the violation of Article 13 GDPR. Share your comments

of these data (hereinafter, GDPR); and in article 47 of the LOPDGDD. SECOND: In accordance with the provisions of article 55 of the RGPD, the Agency Spanish

Claim of C.C.C. 2. Transfer of claim to PLAY ORENES, S.L. 3. Answer to the request of D.D.D. 4. Admission for processing to C.C.C. 5. E / 02186/2019 6

accessible manner, with a clear and simple language. IV Right to erasure Article 17 of the GDPR, which regulates the right to deletion of personal data, establishes

processing operation; (d) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(f), the legitimate interests (d) where the processing is based on Article 6(1)(f), the legitimate

of these data (hereinafter, GDPR); and in article 47 of the LOPDGDD. SECOND: In accordance with the provisions of article 55 of the RGPD, the Agency Spanish

that the controller violated the principle of accuracy under Article 5 (1) (d) of the GDPR. Share your comments here! Share blogs or news articles here

right of freedom of expression and information within the meaning of Article 17(3)(a) GDPR. The controller also stated that there were compelling legitimate

case fell under the household exception found in Article 2(2)(c) GDPR. According to this provision, the GDPR does not apply to the processing of personal data

obligations under Article 5(1)(f) and Article 32 of GDPR. Article 5 (1) : Ticketmaster has failed to comply with the requirements of GDPR including to process

for the health center established in article 17. The LOPD, in relation to articles 17, 18 and, especially article 15 of the LAP, recognizes a right of

constitute personal data under Article 4(1) GDPR? If so, do they qualify as special categories of personal data under Article 9 GDPR? Is the defendant obliged

search the following urls: 1. *** URL.1 2. *** URL.2 3. *** URL.3 SECOND: In accordance with article 65.4 of the LOPDGDD, which has provided for a mechanism

imposition of measures, according to article 58.2 d) of the GDPR. Along with it and In accordance with article 58.2 of the GDPR, it was also indicated that the

technical nature –G. D.1, G.D.2, G.D.3 – or human when a manual call is made –G.D.4, G.E.7-). In the other cases it states the following: G.D.5-G.D.6: In these