Search results

SPANISH DATA PROTECTION AGENCY State Attorney Speaker IImo. Mr.: N.N. S E N T E N C I A Nº: IImo. Mr. President: N.N. Ilmos. Messrs. Magistrates: N.N. N.N.

documents in the file;Took the following decision regarding:- The complainant: Mr X,- The data controller (defendant): Y (Y1), with advice from Maîtres MarcUyttendaele

BACKGROUND FIRST: D. A.A.A. On 10 October 2019, in the name and on behalf of Mr. B.B.B. (hereinafter, the claimant) filed a complaint with the Spanish Data

of € 20.40. This judgment was given by D.J. Post, judge, in the presence of Mr. M.W. Bolzoni, court clerk. The decision was publicly pronounced on: December

Data Protection and based on the following FACTS FIRST: The claim filed by Mr. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the claimant) has entry dated March 29, 2019, in the

cross-examination, Mr Harrison maintained that he did not threaten Mr Cameron during the calls on 7 May. In particular: (1) Mr Harrison claimed that in saying Mr Cameron

SECOND: NOTIFY this resolution to SOUND SOUL, S.L. and INFORM the complainant Mr. A.A.A. In accordance with the provisions of article 50 of the LOPDGDD, this

that Mr. Beatty and Mr. Gahan obtained information from the CCTV as to the days on which Mr. Doolin was in the room and for how long he was there. Mr. Doolin

follow-up The Litigation Chamber of the Data Protection Authority, made up of Mr Hielke Hijmans, President, sitting alone; Having regard to Regulation (EU)

union) The Litigation Chamber of the Data Protection Authority, consisting of Mr. Hielke Hijmans, Chairman and Messrs. Yves Poullet and Christophe Boeraeve

part of this Headquarters, there was no knowledge of the denounced fact by Mr. A.A.A., nor had the existence been observed in XXXXXXXXX of those leaves

HR: 2011: BQ8097 (Santander). 5 Pleading memorandum mr. KJ Zomer nr. 11. 6 Pleading memorandum mr. KJ Zomer nr. 10. 7 CJEU 27 September 2017, ECLI: EU:

restricted formation, dated April 29, 2019; Having regard to the report by Mr. Bertrand du MARAIS, commissioner rapporteur, notified to the company SPARTOO

of the Data Protection Authority, composed of Mr Hielke Hijmans, Chairman, and Mr Jelle Stassijns and Mr Frank De Smet, Members; Having regard to Regulation

(AEPD) received a complaint lodged by Mr. A.A.A. (hereinafter, the "AEPD") de Datos (AEPD) a complaint lodged by Mr A.A.A. (hereinafter, the claimant) against

submitted pursuant to art. 77 of the Regulation dated October 15, 2019 by Mr. XX towards Unicredit S.p.A .; EXAMINED the documentation in deeds; HAVING

presented pursuant to art. 77 of the Regulation dated 16 February 2021 by Mr. XX against Giessegi Industria Mobili S.p.A.; HAVING EXAMINED the documentation

would not allow respond satisfactorily to the request of Mr.... With regard to the subject of Mr. ...'s complaint of July 8, 2020 and entitled "Subject of

[name plaintiff]). 2.2. On [date of birth] was born Mr. [name man] (hereinafter: Mr. [name man] ). Mr. [name man] died on [date of death]. 2.3. The [name

opposed to the privacy interest of Mr. XX". Finally, the lawyer represented that no damage would have been caused to Mr.'s personal and financial sphere