Search results
From GDPRhub
- Vienna Higher Regional Court as Court of Appeal of 7 February 2019, GZ 133 R 113/18t-17, which partially confirmed and partially amended the judgment of200 KB (33,233 words) - 09:49, 14 December 2023
- interests. With total clarity has ruled on this issue the STS of 06/20/2020 (R. cassation 1074/2019), whose sixth Legal Basis says, regarding one of the issues602 KB (102,229 words) - 14:21, 13 December 2023
- observer should be used (OLG Stuttgart, decision of September 6th, 2018 - 4 W 63/18; printed in NJW-RR 2019, 35). In addition, the statement must not be75 KB (12,567 words) - 10:37, 14 November 2022
- SATS eventually responded to all of such requests, although SATS replied 68r the first time 69 to Complainant No 4 – after a reminder from the complainant162 KB (24,007 words) - 19:41, 15 February 2023
- activities. In the Guidelines on Transparency under Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (W P 260 rev. 01), when the information to be provided on the Profiling refers408 KB (64,616 words) - 14:28, 24 November 2022
- art. 6.3. 55C. DE TERWANGNE, The General Data Protection Regulation, p. 136; W. KOTSCHY, The EU General Data ProtectionRegulation (GDPR), p. 336. 56 GDPR150 KB (22,339 words) - 09:50, 21 June 2023