Search results

the vicarious liability of an employer for misuse of private information by an employee and for breach of confidence by an employee has not been excluded

representatives do so for it. An administrative offence, however, is an unlawful and reproachable act that constitutes an offence under a law that allows

learned this (following an access request under Article 15 GDPR), he filed a lawsuit against the defendant. He requested (i) an injunction that the defendant

was an "isolated incident", which took place relatively shortly after "a new and very complex law was introduced" and that the rules concerning an employer's

complaint about the Data Inspectorate's imposition of an infringement fee of NOK 400,000 for having monitored an employee's e-mail box without a legal basis, cf

principle i Article 108 § 1 of the Act requires be maintained where an applicant brings an action before the Market Court which, as a result rights (may) have

indirectly, in particular by association with an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data, an online identifier or one or more special

National Tax Number (NIF) of an alleged neighbour, in order to contact this third party for purposes of checking the boundaries of an allegedly adjacent land

for reporting on persons shifts from an interest that focuses on the crime and the perpetrator to an interest in an analysis of the prerequisites and consequences

which are not obvious to an average visitor to the evaluation portal. In particular, the defendant does not establish such an obviousness by identifying

Hellenic DPA imposed an administrative fine of €20,000 on a leasing company. They fined them €10,000 for violating Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, and an additional €10

used for the imposition of an administrative fine. AP disagrees. The two reported data breaches only prompted the AP to launch an investigation into OLVG's

as joint controllers.-The complainant provides an overview of the provisions on which, according to him, an infringement has been committed. He also requests:1

(basic customers) were used on the site as an advertising platform for paying doctors (premium customers) in an inadmissible manner, partly due to functions

service, I sent an election advertisement for the defendant, in order to to avoid using his professional messaging in his capacity as an MPP. [...] And

in the form of [...]. On [...] November 2018. The Company received an e-mail from an unknown person informing about the theft of the Company's customer

(simple administrative appeal, otherwise known as an application for judicial review). remedy). This is an 'informal' administrative remedy as opposed to

access is understood to be an independent claim. In LAG Hessen 9 Sa 1431/19, the Court stated that "Nor is the applicant's action an abuse of rights. The right

strictly necessary for the provision of an online communication service at the express request of the data subject. If an identifier had more than one purpose

dismissed. 32 a) With an undated letter from February 2017 and an attached addendum to the insurance certificate, the defendant had declared an increase in the