Search results
From GDPRhub
- Helsingin hallinto-oikeus (Finland) - H6072/2021 (category Article 17(3)(a) GDPR)right of freedom of expression and information within the meaning of Article 17(3)(a) GDPR. The controller also stated that there were compelling legitimate61 KB (9,876 words) - 21:38, 24 March 2024
- CNIL (France) - SAN-2019-001 (category Article 7 GDPR)comprehensible character, within the meaning of Article 12 of the GDPR, of the information provided for in Article 13 of the Regulation must be assessed. The90 KB (14,556 words) - 17:08, 6 December 2023
- BVwG - W214 2233132-1/13E (category Article 15(1)(c) GDPR)under Article 77 GDPR was very clear and limited in scope. However, the DSB went on to assert a violation of Article 12 GDPR and Article 15(1)(h) GDPR, acting47 KB (7,519 words) - 09:28, 13 February 2024
- territorial application of the requirements set out in Article 82 of the Data Protection Act is set out in Article 3, paragraph I, of the same Act, which states:73 KB (11,864 words) - 17:03, 6 December 2023
- Tietosuojavaltuutetun toimisto (Finland) - 918/154/2019 (category Article 17(1) GDPR)was outdated and was no longer of importance to society. Pursuant to Article 17(1) GDPR, the data subject had requested Google LLC (the controller) to remove26 KB (4,072 words) - 12:18, 27 March 2024
- Personvernnemnda (Norway) - 2021-20 (20/01648) (category Article 5(1)(a) GDPR)Appeals Board assessed if a fine could be imposed as per Article 83(5) GDPR, cf. Article 83(2) GDPR, and in which case, how large it should be. The Board31 KB (5,018 words) - 18:44, 5 March 2022
- BVwG - W176 2244407-1/18E (category Article 15(4) GDPR)Federal Administrative Court. 3. Legal Assessment 3.1. To dismiss the complaint 3.1.1. In accordance with Art. 15 Para. 1 GDPR, the data subject has the right48 KB (7,816 words) - 11:04, 29 July 2022
- BVwG - W211 2222613-2/12E (redirect from BVwG - W211 2222613-2/12E (request for preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU)) (category Article 15(3) GDPR)the personal data to be provided pursuant to Article 15(1) GDPR: must Article 15(3) first sentence of the GDPR be interpreted as meaning that, due to the51 KB (8,592 words) - 07:03, 2 November 2021
- CJEU - T‑200/21 JS v European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) (category Article 17 GDPR)right to erasure (“right to be forgotten”) of Article 17 GDPR and Article 19 of Regulation 2018/1725. Under GDPR, such prolonged and unrestricted data retention61 KB (9,971 words) - 14:28, 4 January 2024
- CNIL (France) - SAN-2022-025 (category Article 4(11) GDPR)fine, the criteria specified in the same Article 83." 112. Under Article 83 of the GDPR, as referred to in Article 20(III) of the Data Protection Act: "182 KB (13,463 words) - 17:03, 6 December 2023
- AEPD (Spain) - EXP202206626 (category Article 5(1)(c) GDPR)accordance with article 4.1 of the GDPR, is data personnel and their protection, therefore, is the subject of said Regulation. In article 4.2 The GDPR defines35 KB (5,475 words) - 13:21, 13 December 2023
- HDPA (Greece) - 31/2023 (category Article 5(1)(c) GDPR)with the principles of article 5 par. 1 GDPR. It is no coincidence that the GDPR includes accountability (see Article 5 para. 2 GDPR) in the regulation of61 KB (10,257 words) - 10:15, 1 November 2023
- AEPD (Spain) - EXP202201746 (category Article 5(1)(f) GDPR)infringement of Article 32 GDPR. Therefore, the Spanish DPA issued a warning sanction for each violation of Article 5(1)(f) and Article 32 GDPR. AEPD highlighted62 KB (9,703 words) - 13:05, 13 December 2023
- VK Baden-Württemberg - 1 VK 23/22 (category Article 44 GDPR)within the meaning of Article 4 no. 2 of the GDPR and the term "transfer" within the meaning of Article 44 et seq. of the GDPR. GDPR had to be differentiated62 KB (10,113 words) - 12:48, 17 August 2022
- OLG Nürnberg - 8 U 2907/21 (category Article 12(5)(b) GDPR)right to access under Article 15 GDPR because the controller was entitled to reject the request pursuant to Article 12(5)(b) GDPR. The court reasoned that24 KB (3,847 words) - 15:19, 11 September 2022
- OLG Köln - 15 U 126/19 (category Article 17(3) GDPR)pursuant to Article 17(1)(d) GDPR since the data was unlawfully processed. The defendant claimed that its activities fall under exception in (Article 85 GDPR)121 KB (20,412 words) - 15:58, 10 March 2022
- Personvernnemnda (Norway) - 2021-18 (20/02059) (category Article 5(1)(d) GDPR)around the processing of personal data subject to Article 10 GDPR. Pursuant to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, the Privacy Appeals Board conducted a balancing test36 KB (5,859 words) - 06:40, 6 July 2022
- Personvernnemnda (Norway) - 2021-03 (category Article 5(1)(a) GDPR)Ordinance Article 6 No. 1 letter f, for failure to assess protests, cf. Article 21, and for lack of information, cf. Article 13. 2. Pursuant to Article 58 (2)25 KB (4,046 words) - 18:37, 5 March 2022
- HDPA (Greece) - 18/2020 (category Article 5(1)(a) GDPR)provided in the GDPR was not provided to him. 7. As a controller, it follows that New York College violated the principles of Article 5(1) of the GDPR as well12 KB (1,733 words) - 15:34, 6 December 2023
- GDPR, Article 9 GDPR, Article 10 GDPR, Article 30 GDPR and Article 34 GDPR, as well as the provision of the PDPA governing processing of personal data10 KB (1,440 words) - 08:54, 17 January 2020