Search results

as joint controllers.-The complainant provides an overview of the provisions on which, according to him, an infringement has been committed. He also requests:1

in the form of [...]. On [...] November 2018. The Company received an e-mail from an unknown person informing about the theft of the Company's customer

was an "isolated incident", which took place relatively shortly after "a new and very complex law was introduced" and that the rules concerning an employer's

service, I sent an election advertisement for the defendant, in order to to avoid using his professional messaging in his capacity as an MPP. [...] And

strictly necessary for the provision of an online communication service at the express request of the data subject. If an identifier had more than one purpose

National Tax Number (NIF) of an alleged neighbour, in order to contact this third party for purposes of checking the boundaries of an allegedly adjacent land

the service (for example through a website, an application, an account with identifier, the interface of an IoT device or by email), it is obvious that

the Data Protection Commissioner has requested an explanation from Verkkokauppa.com Oyj in the case with an explanation request dated 13 April 2021. The

dismissed. 32 a) With an undated letter from February 2017 and an attached addendum to the insurance certificate, the defendant had declared an increase in the

the CNPD received several complaints and immediately started an investigation and issued an order to suspend the sending of personal data from the census

access is understood to be an independent claim. In LAG Hessen 9 Sa 1431/19, the Court stated that "Nor is the applicant's action an abuse of rights. The right

(simple administrative appeal, otherwise known as an application for judicial review). remedy). This is an 'informal' administrative remedy as opposed to

systematic is not such as to guarantee an appropriate involvement of the DPO, nor to establish his position in as an interlocutor within the organization

Hellenic DPA imposed an administrative fine of €20,000 on a leasing company. They fined them €10,000 for violating Article 5(1)(c) GDPR, and an additional €10

Office of the Data Protection Commissioner has requested an explanation from the clinic with an explanation request dated August 25, 2020. The deadline

com/abstract=3319284. 10, i. An end user requests a web page; ii. The publisher's ad server on the web page selects an SSP; iii. The SSP then selects an Ad exchange; iv

appear when creating an account under each of the privacy settings. In addition, an email message is sent to users when they create an account stating that:

Chamber emphasises that the purpose of imposing an administrative fine is not to only to put an end to an offence committed but, above all, to ensure effective

as to the reliability of the AOD in the case - who, after all, is an entity with an interest in not disclosing the fact of the breach committed by its

are monitored by an independent body. Art. 47 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy and an impartial court