Search results

complainant. The deletion of insolvency data from the edict file did not in any way lead to an obligation to delete data for the party involved. The data

City of Helsinki's Legal Services unit to clarifywhether there have been any changes in the interpretation of this Article since the form was drawn up

the GDPR merely requires the controller to implement TOMs in order to avoid any personal data breach, if at all possible. It cannot be inferred from this

three years, "b) The processing of personal data without the fulfillment of any of the conditions of legality of the treatment established in article 6 of

that citizens are bound by any kind of confidentiality or confidentiality of classified information in order not to disclose to any third party the fact of

society services states that 'service' shall mean any information society service, that is to say, any service normally provided for remuneration, at a

regulations, with the exception of any other document supporting their collaboration. 47. The Contentious Chamber also rejects any qualification of co-responsible

activity and  (ii) the convictions and records relating to her, including any decision of the Supreme Court on an appeal. A relevant case: HDPA 12/2024

President of the Office for the Protection of Personal Data would end the case, any lengthy examination of the case may pose a threat to the functioning of the

Articles 13 and 14 GDPR: the APD/GBA found that the defendant did not provide any information concerning the collection and processing of personal data in the

applicant's appearance has been described, and requests have been made to report any observations about the applicant to the Helsinki Police Command Center. The

ordinario) (Art. 23, Art. 31 of Law 1/2000). Natural persons are not subject to any fee for filing a civil lawsuit (Art 4.2.a of Law 10/2012). The European Commission

of an applicant for employment or an employee, nor shall it give rise to any adverse consequences for them. In particular, it may not constitute a reason

rights under the GDPR. In the present case, the data subject was not pursuing any of these interests. It only used the right to access to pursue a possible

complainant’s requests, satisfying the right of access and providing him with any document or electronic record of request. The company replied to the Authority

Article 6(3) GDPR do not preclude national rules from laying down, without any limit in time, an obligation for Internet advertising service providers to

processing of personal data? In such circumstances, does EU law establish any requirements concerning how, in detail, that decision should be made?' To

that she had activated absence report. The department head did not receive any absence notification when she tested the e-mail address shortly after. She

The defendant further declares that he accepts to receive electronically any communication relating to the case (Article 98, 1° of the ICA) - On 24 June

"Personal data" means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person ("data subject"); [...]. Processing" means any operation or set