Search results

to Art. 79 GDPR, is not an exhaustive list of further available remedies. This also does not follow from recitals 9, 11 and 13 of the GDPR, which speak

With regard to the 14th recital of the GDPR, it is clear that legal persons such as the insolvency debtor cannot rely on the GDPR. Via the detour of § 2a

violation of Article 5(1)(e) GDPR and Article 32 GDPR, but the DPA dismissed its previous finding of the Article 5(1)(b) GDPR violation. The DPA found that

15 to 22 of the GDPR (art. 12.1 of the GDPR GDPR). When a data subject makes a request in accordance with Articles 15 to 22 of the GDPR, the data controller

Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 6(1) GDPR The DPA held that the controller did not violate Article 5(1)(a) GDPR and Article 6(1) GDPR. The DPA stated

of 1 February 2020], Art. 4 GDPR marginal no. 125; Buchner/Kühling in Kühling/Buchner, DS-GVO BDSG, 2nd edition, Art. 4 GDPR marginal no. 8). In substance

adjustment on Art. 15 (1) and (3) GDPR. 53 aa) According to Art. 15 (1) GDPR, the person responsible (Art. 4 No. 7 GDPR), i.e. the person who decides on

Article 6 GDPR. The DPA established that notwithstanding that the controller has a legal basis for processing, processing is still in breach of the GDPR when

persuasive weight.   82.  Recital 24 of the GDPR is relevant to the construction of Article 3(2)(b) GDPR and Article 3(2)(b) UK GDPR, this reads as follows:

regard to the modalities in Article 12 GDPR. Recital 58 of the GDPR states that information under Article 14 GDPR can be provided in electronic form, for

wrongly relied on the GDPR to redact documents. In this judgment, the Supreme Court clarified the relationship between the GDPR and domestic evidentiary

accountability pursuant to Article 5(2) UK GDPR because it failed to demonstrate compliance with Article 5(1)(a) and (c) UK GDPR principles of lawfulness, fairness

17 of the GDPR), the right to restriction (Article 18 GDPR), as well as the right of opposition (Article 21 GDPR) 91. Article 17 of the GDPR states: 1

points out that the term “personal data”, as explained in Article 4.1 GDPR, Recital 26 GDPR as well as Group Opinion 4/2007 Data protection and the case law

several GDPR violations by the controller, and went on to assess whether they could give rise to the award of immaterial damages under Article 82 GDPR also

regarding Article 6(1) GDPR and consent requirements regulated previously to GDPR. The fact that the infringements related to Article 25 GDPR did not include

personal data under Article 4(1) GDPR. Nevertheless, this information may also include non-personal data to which the GDPR does not apply. Finally, the vehicle

in directive 95/46/EC, which was replaced by the GDPR. 90. Thus, since the entry into force of the GDPR, the "consent" provided for in the aforementioned

2 of the GDPR, Article 24.1 of the GDPR, Article 25.1 of the GDPR and Articles 32.1 and 32.2 GDPR; 2. Articles 35.1, 35.2, 35.3 and 35.7 GDPR; and 3. Article

Article 51 of the GDPR. 17. By Article 57(1) of the GDPR, it is the Commissioner's task to monitor and enforce the application of the GDPR. 18. By Article