Search results

measures. In 2019, the Austrian Data Protection Authority (DSB) initiated an ex officio investigation against the controller, following media reports about

78(1) GDPR, Article 25 of the Norwegian Data Protection Act and Article 4-4(4) of the Norwegian Dispute Act (in Norwegian: tvisteloven). 69 10. Right to

in the interest, which is certainly considered legitimate, not to interrupt ex abruptly the contacts with customers that the [complainant] had contacted

LOPD), typified in the Article 44.4.b) of the LOPD (LES). C / Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es 4/14 FIFTH: On May 6, 2019, proceedings

Protection Regulation) Article 6 (1) (d), Article 6 (1), Article 12 (2), (3) and (4), Article 17 (1) and violates the general practice of the Applicant in relation

sanction are considered complete, pursuant to art. 58, par. 2, lit. the). 4.4 On the retention times of personal data As described above (see point 6 of

condition of the contract employment, nor even for the special categories. 4.4.3. Page 4 of the Declaration clearly lists the cases concerning the conditions

L 74 of March 4, 2021, p. 35), hereinafter referred to as "Regulation 2016/679", after conducting administrative proceedings initiated ex officio to impose

15. In vaststellingen 3 en 4 neemt de Inspectiedienst de kwalificatie als verwerkingsverantwoordelijke, in de zin van art. 4, 7) AVG, van de verweerder

disputed this and argued that the Civil Code. 6:23. § (4) limitation may not be taken into account ex officio in judicial or administrative proceedings. In

regulations on the protection of of data) (OJ L 119 of 4.05.2016, p. 1, OJ L 127 of 23.05.2018, p. 2 and OJ L 74 of 4.03.2021, p. 35 ), hereinafter referred to as

complaining company was informed about the complaint with the no. prot.C / EX / 4863-1 / 09-08-2019 document of the Authority with which it was requested

January 28, 2021 (EUR 1 = PLN 4.5479) - an administrative fine in the amount of PLN 18,192 ( which is the equivalent of EUR 4,000), according to the average

with NIF B39764691 (hereinafter, the reclaimed). The claimant states that his ex-wife, administrator of the company CEYLLE SOLUTIONS & DEVELOPMENT S.L. of

Juan 6 www.aepd.es 28001 - Madrid sedeagpd.gob.es Page 4 4/124 by D. DDD (hereinafter claimant 4), against BBVA, noting that, under the pretext If you have

these databases to convey promotional messages on behalf of its clients. 4.4 Methods of acquiring consent to treatment With regard to the formula for expressing

admitted toC / Jorge Juan, 6www.aepd.es28001 - Madridsedeagpd.gob.es Page 4 4/30processing the claim and before the adoption of the initiation agreement

(alleged) change of controllership under Article 4(7) from Google LLC to Google Ireland Limited does not have an ex tunc effect - Google LLC qualifies as controller

Protection Regulation. In addition, the General Data Protection Regulation4. Article 4 (4) profiling will also take place as the data generated by the system

authority has ex officio launched an inspection procedure, which it conducts under the op. no. 06110-418/2022, and against the violator, ex officio, he initiated