Search results

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

no allegation has been received from the party claimed. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP -provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

sanctioning proceedings were initiated, based on Article 63 and Article 64 LPACAP and an infringement of Article 6(1) GDPR typified in Article 83(5) GDPR

the same Article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Administrative Procedure Common Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP) -provision of which

of articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, onCommon Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter,LPACAP), for the alleged violation

no allegation has been received by the respondent party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the respondent was informed in the agreement

against EASYJET, in accordance with the provided in articles 63 and 64 of the LPACAP, for the alleged violation of article 15 of the RGPD, typified in article

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (in hereinafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

articles 63 and 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (in hereafter, LPACAP), for the alleged

provided in article 64.2.b) of the law 39/2015, of October 1, Common Administrative Procedure of the Public Administrations (hereinafter LPACAP), the sanction

indicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative Law of Public Administrations, which in its section f) establishes

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

established in article 64.2.f) of Law 39/2015, of October 1, of the Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (hereinafter, LPACAP). In accordance

no allegation has been received any by the claimed party. Article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP - provision of which the claimed party was informed in the agreement

indicated in article 64 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on the Procedure Common Administrative Law of Public Administrations, which in section f) establishes that

(SSTC 11/1981, of 8 April, F. 7; 196/1987, of 11 December [RTC 1987, 196] , F. 6; and with regard to art. 18, STC 110/1984, F. 5)". In relation to this

accordance with articles 64.2.f) and 85 of Law 39/2015, of October 1, on Common Administrative Procedure of Public Administrations (LPACAP), at the Failure to

data without implementing adequate security measures, violating Article 5(1)f GDPR and Article 32 GDPR. The data subject had health problems arising from

resolution, as established in the article 64.2.f) of the LPACAP. In accordance with the provisions of article 85 of the LPACAP, you may recognize your responsibility