Search results

controller has acted in violation of Article 12.3 and 12.4 GDPR, as well as Article 17.1 GDPR. 2 1 Article 12 GDPR […] 3. The controller shall provide the

pursuant to Article 12(2) GDPR. The DPA ordered the controller to comply with the access request pursuant to Article 58(2)(c) GDPR and Article 95(1)(5) LCA

measures under Article 24 GDPR and 25 GDPR. However, the DPA considered that in this case, the violations of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR and 32 GDPR were sufficient

responsibility – article 5.2. GDPR). It must also implement all the measures necessary for this. effect (Article 24 GDPR). 6. Pursuant to Article 15 § 1 of the

basis of article 62, § 1 2 of the WOG transferred to the Disputes Chamber. 4. In accordance with Article 95, § 2, 3° of the WOG as well as Article 47 of the

Republic of Slovenia (IP), provided a non-binding opinion pursuant to Article 58 GDPR. The subject matter of the opinion regarded the legality of installing

alleged infringement of article 6 GDPR, classified in article 83.5.a) GDPR, and punishable with warning in accordance with article 77.2 LOPDGDD. Nineth. Notified

the performance of a contract (Article 6(1)(b) GDPR) and for legitimate interest (Article 6(1)(f) GDPR). Article 6(1)(b) GDPR In its original draft decision

data and a legal basis would be needed according to Article 6 GDPR and the principles of Article 5 GDPR should be respected. The employer who decides that

complaint with Article 5(1)(c) GDPR. However, Article 58(2)(b) GDPR contains the authority of the DPA to reprimand a controller. Article 58(2)(c) GDPR contains

2023. The Belgian DPA found a violation of Article 21(2) GDPR and Article 12(3) GDPR. Firstly, Article 21(2) establishes the right for a data subject to

deletion under Article 17 GDPR is required. Even in the event of a proper and expert repair, a balancing of interests under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR indicates a

data against unauthorised access as stipulated in Article 5(1)(f) GDPR. The DPA referred to Article 32 GDPR and recommended a logging measure and to keep track

original for more details. - 1 - Business number: Usž-670 / 21-2 Business number: Usž-670 / 21-2 U I M E R E P U B L I K E H R V A T S K E VERDICT The High

(Articles 15 and 17 GDPR). The DPA held that the controller breached Articles 12(3) GDPR, Article 15(1) GDPR and Article 17(1) GDPR by not responding to

the DPA held that the controller infringed Article 12(3) GDPR, Article 12(4) GDPR and Article 17(1) GDPR and ordered the controller to deal with the data

Authority. II.5.2. Established infringement of Article 5(1)(a) j° Article 6(1)(f) and Article 12(2) GDPR in conjunction with Article 17 (1) GDPR. II.5.2.1. Administrative

within the meaning of Article 15 (4) of the Data Protection Regulation. Decision and justification of the EDPS Pursuant to Article 58 (2) (c) of the Data Protection

29 section 1 sentence 2 and section 2 and 3 of the annex to the resolution, as being inconsistent with Art. 35 section 3 point 2 of the Act on in connection

transmitted to the Chamber st 2 Litigation under article 62, § 1 of the LCA. 10. Pursuant to article 95 § 2, 3° of the LCA as well as article 47 of the order regulations