Search results

not give his consent for his personal data to be passed on. He assumes that Ms. S.'s promise of December 2, 2014 not to publish his personal data in connection

[name of family manager] is the family manager on behalf of Youth Protection, Ms [name of team manager] is team manager. 2.4. In a letter of 3 June 2019 to

Agency for Data Protection and based on to the following BACKGROUND FIRST: Ms. A.A.A. (hereinafter the claimant) on 10/23/2022 filed claim before the Catalan

of 25 March 2020 as amended; After hearing in open session: - the report of Ms Christelle Thomas, Maître des requêtes en service extraordinaire, - the conclusions

the fact of running a business; b) the National Court Register (https://ekrs.ms.gov.pl/) - the fact of holding shares in commercial companies; c) property

22 of the Law of January 6, 1978, the President of the Commission appointed Ms Valérie PEUGEOT as rapporteur for the purposes of examining these elements

agreement collectsthe approval of all those concerned and is established between Ms. Z, Mr. Xand the Advisor ”. The copy of the document, provided to the contentious

aforementioned RGPD. SECOND: APPOINT D. B.B.B. as instructor. and as secretary to Ms. C.C.C., indicating that any of them may be challenged, as the case may be

Agency for Data Protection and based on to the following BACKGROUND FIRST: Ms. A.A.A. and D.B.B.B. (hereinafter the claiming party) dated 08/09/2021 filed

and April 15, 2021 at the litigation secretariat of the Council of State, Ms. W ... A ..., Mr. AA ... U ... and Mrs Y ... O ... ask the Council of State:

National Commission for Data Protection sitting in a restricted body composed of Ms Tine A. Larsen, president, and Messrs Thierry Lallemang and Marc Lemmer, commissioners;

these elements, the President of the Commission appointed, on April 12, 2021, Ms. Sophie LAMBREMON as rapporteur, in accordance with Article 39 of Decree No

Ak. This results not least from the communication of the Cy. company to a Ms. A. B. or, according to the applicant, to the latter (Annex AS 33, p. 671

2020-1406 of 18 November 2020; After hearing in public session : - the report by Ms Myriam Benlolo-Carabot, maître des requêtes en service extraordinaire, - the

acceptance area of the program (…)”; “on XX at around 10.40 pm Mr. XX, using Ms. XX's account, attempts several times to access the acceptances of the following

notification - within 3 days from the date of notification of this decision - to Ms M. G. and Mr W. G. about a breach of the protection of their personal data

PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LIMITED RESPONDENT - AND – A. AND B. APPELLANTS JUDGMENT of Ms. Justice Máire Whelan delivered on the 19th day of February 2021 1. This is

documents in the file; Made the following decision regarding: The complainant: Ms. X, hereinafter “the complainant”; . . The defendant: Y , hereinafter: “the

2017-2019 available on the website of the Ministry of Justice https://ekrs.ms.gov.pl/. The analysis of the obtained financial data of the Company shows

registered office in Via Enrico Mattei n. 14, Ancona - and therefore declares Ms. XX's complaint well founded; b) pursuant to art. 58, par. 2, lett. c), of