Search results

interest. Based on Article 2 (1) of the GDPR, the GDPR must be applied to the data management in this case. GDPR Article 4, point 1: "personal data": for

by article 9 of the GDPR -with- recital 51 of the GDPR- and, in addition, many other data not regulated in that precept- to. Recital 75 mentions in detail

organisation are not excluded as such from the scope of the GDPR. To the contrary, Article 9(2)(d) GDPR explicitly states that special categories of data can

under Article 24(1) GDPR, Article 25 (1) GDPR, Article 32(1)(b) GDPR and Article 32(1)(d) GDPR and Article 32 GDPR#2"Article 32(2) GDPR. Share blogs or news

Article 58(2)(d) GDPR. First, the AEPD established that the GDPR was applicable under Article 3(1) GPDR or, if not, at least Article 3(2)(a) GDPR would apply

consent was not valid as a legitimate basis from Article 6(1) GDPR, in relation to Article 7 GDPR, and thus processing was unlawful. On these grounds, the AEPD

of the GDPR by the controller, the DPA issued a fine of €12.100 in accordance with Article 83(4) GDPR, Article 83(5) GDPR and Article 83(6) GDPR. Both the

standard B-VG Art133 Para.4 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 GDPR Art12 GDPR Art15 GDPR Art4 VwGVG §28 paragraph 2 WTBG 2017 §80 saying W101 2218962-1/10E

explicit provisions like the GDPR, which generally clarify the roles of the data controller. However, the terms of the GDPR ("controller", "processor")

4 DSG §1 DSG §24 DSG §24 paragraph 1 DSG §24 paragraph 5 DSG §7 GDPR Art4 GDPR Art5 GDPR Art6 VwGVG §28 paragraph 2 B-VG Art. 133 today B-VG Art. 133 valid

of Article 4(15) GDPR. The DSB founds that the GDPR does not apply due to the household exception provided for in Article 2(2)(c) GDPR. Pursuant to Article

persons from the wording of these standards recognizable (cf. recital 41 second sentence GDPR). The respective directly with the control The respondent's

1.f) of the RGPD and Article 32 of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR and Article 83.4 of the GDPR respectively. SIXTH: The aforementioned

of the GDPR. The mechanisms for the protection of the rights and freedoms of citizens and would be contrary to the spirit of the GDPR. The GDPR is endowed

data transfers would not be valid in accordance with Article 49(1) GDPR and Article 7 GDPR, given that consent was required within the contract without an

with recital 63 of the GDPR. If the other party argues that it was not provided with the information pursuant to Article 14(2)(c) and (d) of the GDPR (existence

present complaint was filed on 1 August 2019. On the basis of the above recital, the period of time that has elapsed so far - also in view of the requests

5(1)(d) GDPR and data protection by design of Article 25(1) GDPR. In addition, the DPA held that the controller violated Articles 5(1)(a) and 13 GDPR by not

1.f) of the RGPD and Article 32 of the GDPR, typified in Article 83.5 of the GDPR and Article 83.4 of the GDPR. C/ Jorge Juan, 6 www.aepd.es 28001 – Madrid

2022, Art. 82 GDPR marginal number 14). With regard to recital 146 sentence 1 of the GDPR, however, processing must have violated the GDPR (Nemitz, in: