Search results

2 of the GDPR, Article 24.1 of the GDPR, Article 25.1 of the GDPR and Articles 32.1 and 32.2 GDPR; 2. Articles 35.1, 35.2, 35.3 and 35.7 GDPR; and 3. Article

grounds for processing according to Art 6 Para 1 GDPR (see Art 6 Para 1 lit a GDPR; as well as recital 43 GDPR). Only one (valid) consent is subsequently one

protection of their personal data (cf. Article 8 of the GDPR for the area of consent and Recital 38). Furthermore, continuous monitoring of minors in the

pieces of information (see also Recital 63 GDPR). In accordance with Article 15 Paragraph 3 GDPRArticle 15 Paragraph 3 GDPR, the controller provides a copy

Charter. 61 First, it should be noted that, in the light of recital 19 of the GDPR and recitals 9 to 12 of Directive 2016/680 and by virtue of Article 2(1)

under Union law at the time of the decision of the Higher Regional Court. 38 However, the first argument against this seems to be that these requirements

101 and 102 TFEU (see Recital 150 GDPR) only applies to those within the meaning of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU (see Recital 150 GDPR). is relevant for the

Paragraph 3 GDPR specifies content requirements for an appropriate legal basis, which are clear and precise in the context of recital 41 of the GDPR and should

wrongly relied on the GDPR to redact documents. In this judgment, the Supreme Court clarified the relationship between the GDPR and domestic evidentiary

the GDPR). The DSB is a supervisory authority within the meaning of Article 51 GDPR Article 51, GDPR (see also Section 18 Paragraph 1 DSG). The GDPR grants

reinstate the employer for the violation of his data protection rights under the GDPR. Share your comments here! Share blogs or news articles here! The decision

information required under Art. 14 GDPR. recital 60 The defendant requests Recital 61 reject the complaint. Recital 62 As justification, she repeats her

powers of the GDPR are linked to the application of the GDPR. National legislation may assign functions and powers inspired by the GDPR, but can also grant

Article 2(2)(c) GDPR. When the cameras also record, as in this case, public or private spaces, this provisions doesn’t apply. Therefore, the GDPR was applicable

Adopted 13 GDPR for processing on foot of Article 6(1)(b) GDPR . The IE recalls the general requirement of transparencyunder Article5(a)GDPR 54,anditsp

Letter a GDPR). (Article 58 Paragraph One Litera a, GDPR). From this provision, taken together with Article 31 of the GDPR, Article 31 of the GDPR results

3 of Recital 51 GDPR, the DSB found that the pictures taken from the data subject did not constitute biometric data according to Article 9(1) GDPR because

(Article 5(2) GDPR), of engagement of a processor (Article 28 GDPR), and in respect of the security of processing of personal data (Article 32 GDPR). However

have a past infringement of the GDPR determined by the data protection authority since § 24(1) BDSG and Article 77(1) GDPR refer to “infringes” in the present

activities of SPARTOO SAS did not comply with a series of GDPR provisions (art. 5§1(c), 5§1(e), 13, 32 GDPR). In that respect, CNIL imposed a fine of 250,000 euros