Search results

focused beyond the private property of the controller's, violating Article 5(1)(c) and 13 GDPR. On 1st of August 2022, the data subject submitted a complaint

000 for a violation of Article 5(1)(f) of the GDPR. A customer of a gas distribution company (Madrileña Red De Gas, S.A.U) complained to the AEPD claiming

***NIF.1 (hereinafter, the part claimed), for the installation of a video surveillance system located in URBANIZATION ***URBANIZATION.1, ***LOCALITY.1, LLEIDA

the applicant’s personal file.13      Thirdly, the DPO stated that that officer’s legal obligation to retain personal data in the applicant’s personal file

Exchange's cookie. ▪ The user identification of a DSP, often derived from the Ad Exchange's cookie that is synchronised with a cookie from the DSP's domain

with the provisions of Article 6(1)(c), Article 6(1)(f) GDPR, or both provisions? 2.     Does the answer to Question 1 mean: a)      that the person whose

breach of Articles 14.1-2 combined in Article 12.1 and 12.3, 15.1 combined with Article 12.3 and 12.2., 5.1 c) and 5.2. and 24.1-2 of the GDPR, justify

***LOCATION.1, dated November 29, 2021, Verbal Trial XXX/2020, in which ruling dismissed fully the claim filed by Fusiona Soluciones Energéticas, S.A, against

functions assigned to the control authorities in the article 57.1 and the powers granted in article 58.1 of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (General Data Protection

referred to as [applicant] and the State. 1 The procedure 1.1. An application dated 30 January 2019 with productions 1 to 7 was received at the Registry of

for the Authority to deal with L’s complaint against 401 GWN, pursuant to Articles 57(1), point (g) of GDPR and 13 par. 1 point g. 4624/2019, and to exercise

violation of articles 38.1, 38.3, 39.1 a) and 39.1 b) of the GDPR; - to issue an injunction against Company A to comply with Article 38.1 of the GDPR, within

defendant asked the applicant to renew the defendant's access to information, and in particular information on (1) the telephone numbers of advertisers ; (2) the

com/resources/assets/slt3lc6tev37/1M1j5uuFDuLTYiZJJDPBag/bda8d591447971b3df2bccf5aa4e0916/Customer_DPA_v.3_1_-_en_1_Oct_2020.pdf https://edpb.europa.e

applicant's international wanted notice. In addition to the applicant's name and age, the news contains public information about the applicant's crime and

91 Paragraph 1, 709 S. 1, S. 2 ZPO. 44 The amount in dispute is set at a total of 16,000.00 EUR. The determination is based on §§ 48 Abs. 1 GKG, 3 ZPO.

complaint against the complainant regarding the latter's posts on social media that violated the College's Code of Conduct due to their homophobic and racist

(c)), C/EX/2332-1/14-05-2019 (for the complaint under (b) and (c)) and C/EX/2332-1/14-05-2019 (for the complaint under (d)). d'), C/EX/3218- 1/06-06-2019 (for

this data and had therefore violated Articles 9(1) GDPR out of negligence. The DPA fined the controller €1,600,000 pursuant of Article 83(5)(a) GDPR and

with Art. 2 para. 1, Art. 1 para. 1 GG, Art. 17 para. 1 lit. d) DSGVO, because her personal data is stored according to Art. 6 para. 1 lit. f. DSGVO had