Search results

of Data Protection RESOLVES: FIRST: IMPOSE D. B.B.B. with NIF ***NIF.1, for a violation of the Article 5.1.c) of the RGPD, typified in Article 83.5 of

the right to protection of personal data (Article 8 Charter and Article 8 ECHR) is in contrast to the right to protection of property (Article 17 Charter

according to the provisions of article 47 of the Organic Law 3/2018, of December 5, on the Protection of Personal Data and guarantee of digital rights

Claim goes on to rely upon s.169 Data Protection Act 2018 ("DPA 2018"). This section relates to infringement of data protection legislation other than GDPR

processing of personal data on the basis of Article 82 of the GDPR; c. informing the RvdK that the Youth Act decision of 18 September 2018 was wrongly issued

May 25, 2018. As a result of the reform of Union data protection law, the Personal Data Protection Act (523/1999) on personal data protection was repealed

Personal Data Protection Act (Wbp). It asserted that the legal proceedings started on 25 May 2018, and Article 48(10) of the General Data Protection Implementing

specified in the National Data Protection Act (1050/2018), which has been applied since 1 January 2019. The Data Protection Act repealed the previously valid

authority in Article 58(2) of the GPRS, the control, and in accordance with Article 47 of Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December, Protection of Personal Data and Guarantee

9(2)(i) GDPR. The data subject (customer) filed a complaint against a Viennese restaurant claiming a violation of § 1 Austrian Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz

and destroying data, is a processing of personal data as referred to in article 4, opening words, under 2 of the AVG. 2.2. Controller [Data subject] determines

constitutive of a infringement provided for in Article 83.5.a) in relation to Articles 5.1.a) and 9; both of the RGPD. Article 83.5.a) of the RGPD, classifies

According to section 85 (1) GOG, a prerequisite to admit a complaint is that it must violate a fundamental right to data protection by an organ that exercises

Pronounced in public on 9 December 2020 176-851. Annex Personal Data Protection Act Article 35 1. The data subject shall have the right to address himself/herself

(2), Article 60, Article 101, Article 103 of the Act on the Protection of Personal Data of 10 May 2018. (Journal of Laws of 2019, item 1781) in connection

2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation, hereinafter: GDPR), ABl. No. L 119 of 4.5.2016 p. 1; § 9 Paragraph 1 of the Data Protection Act (DSG), Federal

store personal data; - such processing of personal data must at all times be consistent with the principles of data protection found in Article 5 of the GDPR

personal data. A data subject filed a complaint with the DSB claiming a violation of his right to access under Article 15 GDPR. The DSB partially upheld

obligated to delete the data subject's personal data, based on the exception provided in Article 17 (3) (e), which allows a rejection of a data deletion request

2016/679 (General Data Protection Regulation - GDPR), OJ No. L119 of 4.5. 2016; §§ 4 Paragraph 6, 24 Paragraph 1 and 5 of the Data Protection Act - DSG, Federal