Search results

transmitted to the Chamber st 2 Litigation under article 62, § 1 of the LCA. 10. Pursuant to article 95 § 2, 3° of the LCA as well as article 47 of the order regulations

basis for the processing (Article 21(1) GDPR). Finally, the DPA fined the controller €12,000 for a violation of Article 6(1) GDPR due to the lack of a valid

Pursuant to Article 58.2.a) GDPR and Article 95, § 1, 4° WOG, to contact the controller warn that intended processing infringes Article 5.1, b) GDPR and Article

terms of Article 77(1) GDPR. The complainant, however, expected the submission to be processed as a complaint within the meaning of Article 77(1) GDPR. The

as established in article 2.2 of the RGPD and article 2.2.a) of the LO- PDGDD, the following should be noted: it says to article 2.2 of the RGPD: "two

paragraph of Article 29 of the ZIN and the powers under Article 19 of the ZIN, Articles 2 and 8 of the ZInfP, Articles 50, 51 and 53 of ZVOP-1 and Article 57 and

the GDPR, as the data falls under Article 9 GDPR and awarded € 800 in emotional damages. The Austrian Business Code cannot override Article 9 GDPR. There

consent of the 10 complainant (article 6.1 a) of the GDPR combined with article 7 of the GDPR), (2) article 6.1 c) of the GDPR in that the publication results

accordance with Article 58, paragraph 2, subparagraph b of the General Data Protection Regulation, and an order pursuant to Article 58, paragraph 2, subparagraph

conjunction with Article 91(1)(1) ZVOP-1, for which a fine of EUR 830.00 is prescribed, taking into account Article 91(2) ZP-1 and Article 119(1) ZVOP-2 on the application

employer violated their Article 15 GDPR obligations as a data controller. The plaintiff requested information under Article 15 GDPR from its former employer

the data subject requested his personal information (Article 15 (1) GDPR and Article 15 (3) GDPR) from the controller. On the same day, the data subject

6GDPR,Article 5.1.b),Article 5.1.a)j°Article 13andArticle 27 GDPR due to the current processing activities. 23. The purpose of this decision is to inform the

transparency under Article 12(1) GDPR and Article 14 GDPR, as the controller had failed to fulfill the informational obligations under Article 14 GDPR. The municipality

teaching departments have been formally created: article 130.2 of the Law Organic 2/2006; article 82.1 g) and article 92 of Decree 327/2010, of July 13, by which

information about his state of health are defined in Article 4 (15) GDPR as data concerning health. Article 48 of the Employment Relationships Act (ZDR-1),

under Article 4 (11) GDPR when consent is a condition for participating in a lottery, and 2) has the data controller complied with Article 7(3) GDPR and

result, the controllers acted in 1 2 3 contravenes Articles 5.2 and 12.2 GDPR, as well as Article 17.1 GDPR. 1 Article 5.2 GDPR. The controller is responsible

Area exists. Article 3.1 of the GDPR is therefore not applicable. 6. The second case provided for in Article 3.2 GDPR specifies that the GDPR applies to

Subsection 2 of the WOG (Articles 94 to 97). Decision 32/2024 – 5/7 The Disputes Chamber has thus decided, on the basis of Article 58.2.c) GDPR and Article 95