Search results

obligated to delete the data subject's personal data, based on the exception provided in Article 17 (3) (e), which allows a rejection of a data deletion request

application of the General Data Protection Regulation. General Data Protection Regulation Article 5(1)(a) of the General Data Protection Regulation provides for

Legal Protection' of the AVG Implementation Act, Article 34 reads as follows: Article 34. Applicability of the General Administrative Law Act by decision

from the Data Protection Authority dated 12.12.2018 (Supplement ./J), Response from the Respondent to the Data Protection Authority dated 04.12.2018 (Supplement

by the Spanish Data Protection Agency and based on the following FACTS FIRST: A.A.A. (hereinafter, the claimant) on October 4, 2018 filed a complaint with

brief, it contains a ground as referred to in Article 6: 5, read in conjunction with Article 6:24 of the General Administrative Law Act. The appeal describes

June 2019. SECOND: In accordance with article 65.4 of Organic Law 3/2018, of 5 December, Protection of Personal Data and guarantee of digital rights (in

entailed a breach of Articles 5(1)(a), (b) and (c) of the GDPR. Finally, the DPA imposed a fine of €65,000 on Lursoft for breaching Article 5(1)(a), 5(1)(b)

lawfulness, fairness and transparency, f. Article 5(1)(a) The obligation of providing a privacy notice to the data subjects as by Articles 13 and 14 The obligation

personal data, in particular on the basis of Art. 51 Paragraph 1 GDPR in conjunction with Section 40 Paragraph 1 Federal Data Protection Act (BDSG), Section

the data protection authority Section 24. (1) Every data subject has the right to lodge a complaint with the data protection authority if they believe that

regulation. The data protection regulation is specified in the national data protection act (1050/2018). According to Article 4, Section 7 of the Data Protection

stipulated in Article 57 of the Data Protection Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and in Section 14 of the Data Protection Act (1050/2018). According to Article 57, paragraph

the data protected (Article 32, Article 24 (1) and (2) of Regulation 2016/679). Has the Chief Surveyor of the country appointed a data protection officer

does not justify every data processing. As was the case under the Personal Data Protection Act (Wbp), any processing of personal data must meet the requirements

payment (article 6 of the GDPR) and a breach of principle of data minimization (article 5.1 c) of the GDPR) given the excessive nature of requested data. - a

the provisions of article 65.5 of the Organic Law 3/2018, on Data Protection and Guarantee of Digital Rights (LOPDGDD), on 12/12/2018 the agreement of admission

responsible for a violation of articles 5.1.f, of the RGPD -as set out in Article 83(5)(a) of the said regulation and 5(1)(f) in relation to Article 32(1)(b)

of article 6.1 e) of the European Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 The legal basis based on a contractual relationship fits. The treatment data is necessary

their personal data. In this situation, the data controller has, based on Article 5(1)(a) and Article 32 of the General Data Protection Regulation, an