Search results

analyzes the criteria set by Article 83.2 of the GDPR: - As to the nature and seriousness of the violation [article 83.2 a) of the GDPR], with regard to breaches

violation of Article 5(1)(f) GDPR and a fine of €100,000 for the violation of Article 37 GDPR. The DPA issued a reprimand for the violations of Article 5(1)(e)

basis of article 62, § 1 of the WOG transferred to the Disputes Chamber. 2 5. In accordance with Article 95, § 2, 3° of the WOG as well as Article 47 of the

the basis of Article 58, paragraph 2, point b) GDPR and Article 100, §1, 5 ° WOG to be reprimanded for the infringement of Article 25 (1) GDPR; b. on the

fairness principle, violating Article 5(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(e) GDPR, and Article 6 in conjunction with Article 8 Personal Data Protection

the provisions as set out in article 95, § 2 as well as in article 98 of the LCA. They are also informed, pursuant to Article 99 of the LCA, of the deadlines

included in Article 15.1 AVG. As a result, the controller has acted in violation of Articles 12.3 and 12.4 1 2 GDPR , as well as Article 15.1 GDPR . 3 5. Specifically

in the data controller" (Article 6, paragraph 1, letter e ), 2 and 3, and art. 9, par. 2, lett. g), of the Regulations; art. 2-ter of the Code, in the text

the GDPR and the DPA. They are obliged by Article 5(2) to adhere to the data processing principles set out in Article 5(1) of the GDPR. Article 5(2) makes

from the scope of Article 16 GDPR, in my opinion, already follows from the word "inaccurate" in the first sentence of Article 16 GDPR and does not need

basis of article 62, § 1 2 of the WOG transferred to the Disputes Chamber. 4. In accordance with Article 95, § 2, 3° of the WOG as well as Article 47 of the

clerk the office Reference book: yes BGHZ: no BGHR: yes GDPR Article 6 Paragraph 1 Letter f, Article 17 Paragraph 1 On the requirements for a claim for deletion

that teachers could withdraw their consent at any time according to Article 7(3) GDPR with regard to these recordings. For this reason is important to understand

concluded a prima facie breach of Article 15 GDPR and Article 17 GDPR in combination with Article 12(3) GDPR and Article 12(4) GDPR, because the controller did

defining factor for the balancing act under Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. Second, the court decided that Article 17(1)(c) GDPR obliged a controller to delete personal

of his personal data would be based 5. 1, a) GDPR, Article 6, Article 12.1 GDPR and Article 14.1 a) GDPR. 67. Moreover, a controller, in this case defendant

to comply with the request (Article 12(3) GDPR) or not (Article 12(4) GDPR). Without addressing a potential breach of the GDPR, the DPA ordered the controller

processing requirement of the Section 2D of the Data Protection Act 1988. 2. Based on the Court’s analysis of Article 29 of the Data Protection Directive

data on the basis of Article 6.1.e GDPR ? - Did the administration sharing confidential data with a third party violates article 25 GDPR ? - Should the administration

GDPR and Article 66.2 WOG); and • compliance with the transparency obligations (Article 12 GDPR) and the te provide information (Article 13 GDPR). Page