Search results
From GDPRhub
- 6, 2020, the complained party answered the transfer of the claim, stating the following: On the one hand, it indicates that the origin of the claim is25 KB (4,016 words) - 14:27, 13 December 2023
- AP (The Netherlands) - 4.02.2021 (category AP (The Netherlands)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)level of security, taking into account the state of the art and the costs of implementation, the risks involved and the nature of the data. the implementation57 KB (8,053 words) - 17:07, 12 December 2023
- First-tier Tribunal - Vestani v Information Commissioner (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)progress on the complaint, or of the outcome of the complaint, before the end of the period of 3 months beginning when the Commissioner received the complaint15 KB (2,203 words) - 14:39, 21 December 2023
- Court of Appeal of Brussels - 2021/AR/163 (category Court of Appeal of Brussels (Belgium)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)The Court of Appeal of Brussels annulled a fine issued by the Belgian DPA, finding that the DPA should have considered the full range of sanctions at its72 KB (11,389 words) - 08:59, 20 August 2021
- HDPA (Greece) - 29/2023 (category Article 12(3) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)1 of Law 4624/2019 (Government Gazette A΄ 137), in the context of the powers provided for in articles 4 par. 3 and 10 par. 4 of the Regulation of Operation21 KB (3,334 words) - 09:12, 25 October 2023
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2020-442-8866 (category Article 34(3)(c) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)detailed review of the case and a justification for the decision. 2. The competence of the Data Inspectorate In connection with the processing of the present breach20 KB (3,045 words) - 16:40, 6 December 2023
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9446730 (category Article 58(2)(c) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)(EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data34 KB (5,420 words) - 15:51, 6 December 2023
- to the fact that, irrespective of the opening of the factual scope of application of the GDPR - in any event a transfer of the personal data of the responsible31 KB (5,184 words) - 17:19, 15 April 2023
- AP (The Netherlands) - 14.01.2022 (category Article 12(2) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)verification. Hence, the DPA concluded that DPG Media violated Article 12(2) GDPR for not facilitating the data subject’s rights sufficiently. The DPA imposed a fine50 KB (7,656 words) - 17:05, 12 December 2023
- Court of Appeal of Brussels - 2019/AR/1234 (category Court of Appeal of Brussels (Belgium)) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)line with the GPDR. In the appeal procedure, the FPS argues that: 1. the complaint has become devoid of all purpose 2. the DPA interprets the right to access5 KB (609 words) - 12:38, 10 August 2022
- APD/GBA (Belgium) - 55/2021 (category Article 6(3) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)response.2. It appears from the documents in the file that the complainant and Mrs Z (hereafter: the mother of the child)were in the process of divorce81 KB (13,211 words) - 16:59, 12 December 2023
- Persónuvernd (Island) - 2022020363 (category Article 28(3) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)DPA’s assessment, the DPA published its final decision. On the basis of all the above, the DPA first of all clarified that customer data, including data142 KB (22,881 words) - 12:42, 16 January 2024
- center that in the context of examination of the complaint is checked ex officio in relation to the fact of the lack of availability of of the complainant's11 KB (1,522 words) - 09:35, 13 September 2022
- Datatilsynet (Norway) - 20/02225 (category Article 5(2) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)Tollbugt 3 22 39 69 00 22 42 23 50 974 761 467 www.datatilsynet.no 0105 OSLO 01/04/21 Page 2 3. Details of the facts of the case In your reply of 1 September45 KB (7,286 words) - 18:55, 5 March 2022
- AP (The Netherlands) - 25.11.2021 (category Article 58(2)(i) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)database, the DPA found that the Benefits department processed the dual nationalities of 1,400,000 Dutch nationals. The DPA acknowledged that the Benefits87 KB (11,601 words) - 17:08, 12 December 2023
- not covered by the right of access under Article 15 of the Data Protection Regulation. 3.2. It follows from the Data Protection Act [2] § 22, para. 1,16 KB (2,455 words) - 16:38, 6 December 2023
- AEPD (Spain) - TD/00129/2020 (category Article 4(2) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)derived from the contractual relationship, the party The claimant requests the recordings of the calls made on the 6th and 10th of November 2019. The claimant22 KB (3,422 words) - 14:50, 13 December 2023
- Datatilsynet (Denmark) - 2019-431-0048 (category Article 28(3)(f) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)users in the municipalities have been able to access are: the gender of the citizen the age of the citizen citizenship case types: the type of case a citizen18 KB (2,633 words) - 16:36, 6 December 2023
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali (Italy) - 9451734 (category Article 6(2) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)paragraphs 1 and 3, of the Code; c) in violation of the prohibition of dissemination of health data (art. 9, par. 1, 2, 4, of the Regulation referred24 KB (3,697 words) - 15:52, 6 December 2023
- NAIH (Hungary) - NAIH/2020/193/8 (category Article 12(2) GDPR) (section English Machine Translation of the Decision)objected to the processing of the requested data. At the request of the Applicant, the Authority shall take the following decisions in the data protection58 KB (9,413 words) - 10:11, 17 November 2023